TGD | Home

A captive insurance product, called rMost Valuable Insurance, cannot be found with any other insurer! This is a macro priced insurance coverage for children and their families.

Every child's parents and grandparents will demand our insurance product, they don't even have to pay for it, crowdfunding does!

Macro Pricing, $1. Per $1K of Insurance.

currently consists of 5 highly profitable, companies all technologically tied together with a single steering committee.

Is TGD Consortium's 501(c)(3) Marketing Arm of Boots on the Ground Warriors - Leadership - Organizers - Ambassador's - Influencers - Volunteers for Social Good all promoting the (CPa) Child Pro Mobile App

Captive Insurance - Macro Priced Top Secret New Product!! Over 1 Million Members 1st Year = $240 Million “Initial Industry Feasibility studies completed"

1 st Year Fin Tech Non bank producing $ Billions in transactions a new monster in a $4.7 trillion industry

There are no non bank mobile app's where the on boarding is a leveraged by product by using the love of your child to produce crowdfunding for a particular child's education. A silent foot in the door approach. Entire families end up with Companion Cards and accounts before they or grandparents even realize it. Nobody desires to open accounts or Financial institutions. Financial institutions spend over $500.00 to get anyone to sign up or switch accounts. Financial institution on boarding numbers are terrible!

Our on boarding puts us in a league of our own!

“Patented Side By Side Technologies"Aerobic Bioreactor & Waste To Energy Generate up to 10x Landfill revenues and avoid Garbage into Mother Earth!

Is Powered By: Peoples Web Inc. The underlying foundational structure element of our “Tied Industries".This element allows the TGD Consortium to collectively share resources socially and financially for the greater good.

The Definition of a Captive Insurance Company:

The strict definition is “an insurance vehicle that is owned by its policyholder(s)".

There are two types of captives:

a) Pure captives — these are owned by their insureds and include both single-parent and group captives.

b) Sponsored captives — these are owned and controlled by unrelated parties and include rental and cell captives.

rMost Valuable Insurance Company will most likely be a pure captive, which is formed by a group of individuals or entities with joint ownership of a captive insurance company. One kind of group-owned captive allows a group of insureds from entirely different industry groups to be a joint owner. This heterogeneous group captive may be a reinsurance pool,formed to create under writing capacity through the pooling of risk. A reinsurance pool does not provide direct insurance but reinsures either the captives of its owners or the admitted insurers that issue policies to the pool's owners. The group captive or pool may also provide other risk management services for the group.

rMost Valuable Insurance Company will operate as this latter type of captive. The tied industries of the TGD Consortium will form the joint ownership structure and reinsurance will be provided through a partner commercial insurance company that can provide capital toward initial risk coverage. We have begun exploring multiple reinsurance partnerships.

Benefits from the captive insurance structure would be massively significant

Here's why:

Improved cash flow.
Asset protection from the claims of business and personal creditors.
Stabilized Pricing and increased availability of insurance.
Reduction in the amount of insurance premiums presently paid by our operating companies.
Access to the lower-cost reinsurance market.
Ensuring risks that would otherwise be uninsurable.
Tax deduction for our parent company, with insurance premiums paid to the captive.
Distributions to captive owners at favorable income tax rates.
Various other tax savings opportunities, including gift and estate tax savings for the shareholders and income tax savings for both the captive and our members.
Ability to broaden coverage options with growth (expanding to offer business insurance, Flood, Home, Life, Auto, Pet, etc.)

Captive insurance companies continue to experience growth. One of the key reasons is that captives provide organizations with greater control over their risks in the following ways:

By facilitating the ability of businesses to collect underwriting and loss data.
By providing them with information to make informed decisions about how to drive down costs.
By reducing the frequency and severity of losses.
By managing risk more effectively - regardless of market conditions.
By enjoying the same tax status afforded commercial insurers, and further building on their ability to accumulate capital to protect against loss.

As a result of their willingness to write a broader range of emerging risks, the popularity of captive insurance companies is increasing. In many cases, the captive acts as an incubator regarding environmental and reputational type risks. In a sense, it's holding risk until the market has sufficient data to model, price, and accept the risk. Being therefore more comfortable retaining these risks, the captive gains the ability to plan for a predetermined increase in risk capacity and can better create and execute its strategic road map.

In addition, the number of jurisdictions in which captives can be established has expanded, particularly in the United States. Captive growth is also due to increasing representation of the middle market, particularly in the area of group captives. More small- to medium-sized companies are expressing an interest in this type of captive, looking at like-minded companies of similar size with similar exposures, and exploring how captives can help them manage both costs and risk.

Why rMost Valuable Insurance Company is a Captive:

rMost Valuable Insurance Company is providing insurance coverage that cannot be found with any other insurer, and in order to launch the product, we feel that the captive insurance structure is the most compatible with our business model and growth plans.

rMost Valuable Insurance Company policy holders not only have ownership in and control of the company but benefits from its profitability. Simply put, we're willing to risk our own capital in anticipation of the financial rewards associated with better control over our insurance program. This is based on several logical premises:

We are a profitable entity seeking substantial annual adjustable tax deductions.
Businesses with multiple entities like ours can create multiple operating subsidiaries or affiliates.
Our businesses will have $500,000 or more in sustainable operating profits.
Our businesses have requisite risks currently not insured or that could easily be under insured.
As businesses owner(s) we are interested in personal wealth accumulation and family wealth transfer strategies.
As businesses owner(s) we are looking for asset protection.
Fronting Insurance Company Partner: Examples - AIG, The Hartford, (AARP), Met Life.
Proprietary software built into the Child Pro (CPa) Crowdfunding mobile app.
First Month 40k Participants. Over 1 Million 1st year.
$240 Million 1st year Insurance Premium Revenue.
Macro Pricing, $1 per $1K of Insurance
Premiums paid via crowdfunding participants.
Projected annual return on investment between 100% to 150%
Premier independent captive insurance management firm.
Regulatory compliance throughout the U.S.
Licensed insurance agents.

Our top-secret insurance product will be offered initially as the sole insurance product available from rMost Valuable Insurance Company. Once profits reach appropriate levels and according to our strategic plan, the product offering will be expanded to underwrite additional coverage options that include the following:

Flood Insurance
Life Insurance
Home Insurance
Auto Insurance
Pet Insurance

Other in-demand coverage opportunities will be made available that make sense for our risk model and customer demographics. Our policyholders will be parents and grandparents who are trying to do the best to protect and provide for their children and grandchildren.

With the market focus on children and their families,rMost Valuable Insurance Company's business is very low risk. The claim dollar amounts will be relatively small, premiums are low, and the volume of new policies will be high. Those three attributes of the program, paired with the structure of TGD Consortium and our partnerships with large, stable insurance providers, make rMost Valuable Insurance Company a sturdy venture.

Of course, we are well aware of the serious risks associated with the insurance business,and will take extreme care,being fully committed to maintaining a comprehensive risk management program. All risk factors will be addressed and executable monitoring and reporting procedures implemented in order to mitigate exposure to loss. The Risk Management program will be used to perform evaluations of under writing policies and procedures, including analyses of data and in order to achieve continuous improvement. We are prepared to break through barriers and offer something special and secure to our policy holders…

Keys to success with one hundred-plus combined years of experience:

On-Going Management: A laser-focused team that pays attention to detail while seeing the big picture, all with a smile.
Formation and licensing of our captive insurance company in record time (cells and series, too).
Regulatory Compliance: a subcontracted, seasoned team to take care of the red tape so we don't have to.
Partnering with a financially strong fronting company for insurance regulatory compliance throughout the US.
Licensed insurance agents to achieve insurance regulatory compliance throughout the US for the sale of our top-secret insurance product.
Insurance promoted via Communities For Education.
Discount advertising, marketing, and licensing provided via Peoples Web, Inc.
Adequate capital to support the underwritten risk.

Marketing Plan

We use a “Mobile First Approach" to get rMost Valuable Insurance Company's top secret insurance product to market. There are over 73 million children in America alone. Our target market is 1 out of every 7 children.

Benefits of a Mobile First Approach:

Jan 2021: 85% of American adults say they own a smart phone. Studies show each adult has an average of 671 Social Ties within their mobile device. Direct ties 15 - Close Friends & Family, In-Direct Ties 35 - Ex-School Mate, Co-Workers, Social ties - 621 Email, FB, Twitter, SMS, Phone #'s, Pinterest, Instagram, YouTube, Social Networks (SNS) …
There is a 40% Overlap in Social Ties.
The average adult belongs to 5.5 Social Networking Services (SNS), active in 2.8 SNS.
Each child will receive $1,775.13 in initial deposits, and $184.40 in monthly recurring deposits.
Eighty percent of children 11-18 years of age have smart phones that contain a multitude of Social Ties (many times more than the parent). The numbers reflected do not include this data.
Over $10 million in industry research supports our numbers & documentation.
From here it is uncontrolled viral growth.

TGD Consortium partner, Communities For Education, serves as a sales and marketing vehicle for the rMost Valuable Insurance Company insurance product. How?Communities For Education hosts events in the community in partnership with local organizations. They partner with businesses of all sizes to implement Internet of Things (IoT) technologies in order to empower the local business revenues using the local big data, data that cannot otherwise be attained without human input, and package the data into useful ways local businesses will utilize to interact with their customers. Possibilities include offering incentives, rewards, discounts, gift cards etc., to drive their business growth by strengthening and expanding their customer base. Many of these companies will turn to Communities For Education for enhanced growth, larger profits, social good, and to AVOID being left behind because of the services that are offered to them.

Communities For Education is partnering with a nationally known and demanded motivational speaker with a similar mission to ours. We maintain a sharp focus on getting the entire community to download the Child Pro Mobile app and begin to empower and change the lives of the entire community.

Communities For Education is present in the community and generates revenue in partnership with local business by providing unique products and services to the businesses and their consumers!

Financial Projections

A formal ProForma has been developed and will be available upon an approved request. The data is highly profitable and based on projections from research completed in the development of the business plan.

(CPa)Child Pro App

NGD CORP CONCEPTUAL INSURANCE PROGRAM

INSURANCE PROGRAM INCOME STATEMENT (ProForma Annual)

# Insured Kids	2,000	50,000	1,000,000
Fronting Insurance Company	Avg Limit $10K	Avg Limit $10K	Avg Limit $10K

Underwriting Income

Gross Written Premium	480,000	12,000,000	240,000,000
Chg in Unearned Premium Rsv	-	-	-
Earned Premium	480,000	12,000,000	240,000,000
Ceded Premiums to Captive	360,000	10,800,000	240,000,000
Net Written Premium	120,000	1,200,000	-

Underwriting Expenses

Fronting Fees & Taxes	72,000	1,800,000	36,000,000
Other Expenses	72,000	1,800,000	36,000,000
Ceding Commissions	(118,800)	(3,564,000)	(79,200,000)
Net Underwriting Expense	52,450	308,700	(7,200,000)

Net Underwriting Profit	67,550	891,300	7,200,000
Profit Sharing to Child Pro TDB	-	-	-
Net Investment Inc 4.0%	1,351	17,826	144,000
Net Income Before Tax	68,901	909,126	7,344,000

Federal Income

Tax	35%	(24,115)	(318,194)	(2,570,400)

Net Income After Tax	44,786	590,932	4,773,600

Child Pro Reinsurance

# Insured Kids	2,000	50,000	1,000,000
Quota Share %	75%	90%	100%

Underwriting Income

Assumed Premiums	360,000	10,800,000	240,000,000
Chg in Unearned Premium Rsv	-	-	-
Earned Premium	360,000	10,800,000	240,000,000
Retroceded Premiums	-	-	-
Net Written Premium	360,000	10,800,000	240,000,000

Underwriting Expenses

Ceding Commissions	118,800	3,564,000	79,200,000
Premium Taxes	5,000	24,300	100,000
Administration	20,000	560,000	3,820,000
Claims Estimate	81,750	2,454,300	54,540,496
Net Underwriting Expense	225,550	6,602,600	137,660,496

Net Underwriting Profit	134,450	4,197,400	102,339,504
Net Investment Inc 3%	2,017	62,961	1,535,093

Net Income After Tax	88,703	2,769,235	67,518,488
Net Income Before Tax	136,467	4,260,361	103,874,596
Federal Income Tax 35%	(47,763)	(1,491,126)	(36,356,109)

Capital Requirement 20%	125,000	2,160,000	48,000,000
s.t. $125,000 min ROI	71%	128%	141%

With rMost Valuable Insurance Company and the TGD Consortium , the possibilities are endless.

We strongly believe that we can make a difference by offering a robust products and services that empower every person and every entity within a community. We make life better!

We are looking for the right relationships for our consortium of Startups!

For more information, please contact:

Respectfully,

RJ Randall

Co-Founder

Direct Text/Phone: 1 (407) 325-6568

Text me if I do NOT answer.

Email: [email protected]

Address: 555 Winderley Pl. Suite 114

Maitland, FL 32751

The United States

Visit:https://ngdconsortium.com

Visit:https://dincog.com

Please consider the environment before printing this document.

The information contained herein is confidential. Access to this information by anyone other than the addressee(s) is unauthorized. If you are not the named recipient(s) or authorized by the named recipient(s), any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.

Upcoming Next

At the heart of the "Pay Me Revolution" TGD Financial is the harpoon to products and services; collecting, paying, crowd sourcing, crowd funding multi-faceted bank cards, purses, and a wallet.All these are access points to incentivization,and a rewards platforms provided by the TGD Consortium.

With this technology, TGD Corp immediately impacts communities by drastically lowering the communities carbon footprint. We are currently negotiating an agreement to consummate our first commercial-sized Aerobic Bioreactor as a startup. This allows us the ability to Presale Carbon Credits before we even break ground. Extreme PROFITS. Healthy Community. Saving Mother Earth.

The TGD Labs division is uniquely structured to provide technology and business solutions within the TGD Consortium that includes licensing, mobile support, and creative marketing services to the Consortium partners. We call it The People's Web.

Upcoming Next

At the heart of the "Pay Me Revolution" TGD Financials is the harpoon to products and services; collecting, paying, crowd sourcing, crowd funding multi-faceted bank cards, purses, and a wallet.All these are access points to incentivization,and a rewards platforms provided by the TGD Consortium.

A captive insurance product, called rMost Valuable Insurance,cannot be found with any other insurer! This is a macro priced insurance coverage for children and their families.

With this technology, TGD Corp immediately impacts communities by drastically lowering the communities carbon footprint. We are currently negotiating an agreement to consummate our first commercial-sized Aerobic Bioreactor as a startup. This allows us the ability to Presale Carbon Credits before we even break ground. Extreme PROFITS. Healthy Community. Saving Mother Earth.

Proud member of

A Case for our Patented (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System and the Methodology / Protocols we have been issued

We use the Cap-and-Trade market to fund world change a greener planet and educations

The NGD Environmental (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System is the worlds remedy to landfill environmental issues by making the life of a landfill (a garbage dump - plot of land) Endless- Regenerative - Sustainable

No more digging GIANT holes to fill with garbage and another and another and another etc...

No more killing mother earth, instead modernizing, creating productive, high revenue generating lives for landfills in all communities around the world!

(Help Save Our Oceans, Our Planet)

TGD Corp Plans to Make Landfills Extinct using: Dual (WTE) Waste to Energy Technologies. Our patented/licensed process is called the "Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System" (ALBS). It is recognized by USEPA. The technology has been certified by the United Nations (UN) as CDM Methodology Number "AM0083".

The average landfill is 33 acres, holds 1 million tons of garbage, and puts off 1.2 million tons of Methane Gas creating a net value of approximately $40 million dollars of carbon credits. Monetization of these credits will allow funding of higher educations and local public works projects.

Methane Gas is 23 X stronger than CO2. Our (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System eliminates over 95% of a landfills methane gas released from the average landfill.
Each landfill eliminated is like removing 300,000 vehicles off the road.
Our (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System also eliminates 100% of the contamination getting into our water tables and there is no smell to the landfill.
Our WTE technologies allow municipalities to remove all waste of all types and no longer add garbage to the ground instead.

Our 1st WTE Technology Eliminates 100% of the Methane Gas and produces a 0% Carbon Footprint

With this technology, TGD Corp immediately impacts communities by drastically lowering the communities carbon footprint. We are currently negotiating an agreement to consummate our first commercial-sized Aerobic Bioreactor as a startup. This allows us the ability to Presale Carbon Credits before we even break ground. Extreme PROFITS. Healthy Community. Saving Mother Earth.

“To protect a parent's most valuable investment, their children,
and the community's most valuable investment, its future."

We provide complete landfill remediation, sustainability, and greenhouse gas mitigation at the lowest cost while providing significant environmental, social, and economic benefits. Our passion for making things better here on Earth. Our mission focuses heavily on turning normal daily activities into real opportunities to improve life for every family in every community.

Included in this document, we explain landfill technologies, share a synopsis / mini business summary of TGD Environmental a1–5-year revenue model with you. We even included some information about our plans for building out the TGD Consortium needed to forge a new path for communities around the world, a path toward a more secure, educated happier,healthier, wealthier, lives for all.

Highlights:

TGD Environmental has no competitors in the sustainable Landfill business we’re changing the rules
regarding Landfills.
We will be targeting both currently operational(Green Landfills) and closed (Brown Landfills). With a plan to convert as many as possible to become high revenue generating, clean, sustainable sources of income for each community and the lives of its citizens within the community.
Although we can support any community we intend to start with California and Canada both utilizes an auction system that covers both California and the Canadian province of Quebec. Quarterly, state-run auctions are held which include a secondary market of companies buying and selling allowances among themselves. Although most of the participating companies produce greenhouse gases and need to buy the allowances for themselves and their own use, financial institutions trading solely for profit have become increasingly involved.

Alberta Canada Carbon Credits in 2022 are $50 per ton and if the bill in front of the Canadian parliament passes an additional $15 per year to be at $170 per ton by 2030. Three months after our first commercial sized (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System is fully operational In 2023 we expect carbon credits to have a market price is$60 - $80 minimum a ton or more.
California carbon credits just recently Set an all-time Record Price in Cap-and-Trade Auction at $34.01 and it is expected they will continue rising at record levels.
Canada allows for the presale sale of Carbon Credits prior to breaking ground on our (ALBS). We will initially be selling our carbon credits as needed to cover cost. Verified carbon credits are at a

Click Here

The average 33-acre landfill holds 1 million tons of garbage which will emit approximately 1.2 million tons of methane. By the time we construct and bring our 1st commercial size (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System to being fully operational and an updated baseline recorded, we expect at the current market (Based on what we have seen the market do since the mid 1990’s) to have a value of at least $55 - $60+ million dollars per average projected landfill project.

As a lead member of the TGD Consortium, TGD Environmental is taking over a $100+ billion-dollar industry!

As a startup company, the assets that we have are the newly patented (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System process and our Canadian Carbon Credit Protocol and being recognized by the USEPA and certified by the (UN) United Nations as CDM Methodology Number “AM0083" which allows TGD Environmental to create carbon credits that can be sold in the open markets.

To recreate just the Canadian Protocol&U.N.Methodology#would cost millions of dollars and years of work.

“If you have a complete understanding of every facet of all landfill technologies,you completely understood the cap-and-trade market and if you controlled the patents. Then you can do this!"

SAVE MILLIONS / INVEST NOW

Have a look at our revenue models and the planned initial projects below

The world is headed in a new direction. You can just feel the world SCREAMING wanting to go electric and become carbon neutral!

THE NUMBER$ HAVE CHANGED

WITH THE SPIKE OF MUNICIPALITIES WANTING TO BECOME CARBON NEUTRAL

The following prediction assumptions were used:

3 Landfills in Year One
15 Landfills in Year Two
50 Landfills in Year Three
100 Landfills in Year Four
200 Landfills in Year Five

TGD Environmental maybe aggressive in the number of landfills in Years Four and Five. However, we have already identified 45 landfills that are interested in our technology and there are six landfills that we believe we can quickly motivate into letting us to started in cleaning up their landfills and supporting their needs in 2022.

What is TGD Environmental

TGD Environmental is a start-up engineering and solid waste consulting company that alongside our constituents holds multiple patents on a new environmental (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Systems that changes the rules regarding landfills: it allows all the space in existing landfills to be re-used, freeing up future land and financial assets. Once landfills are filled or closed, instead of building new landfills, municipalities wanting to be carbon neutral can avoid the Post Closure Cost such as the Mandatory Landfill Capping Expense of approximately $300,000 to $350,000 per acre and the monitoring of the Landfill for 30+ years, as well.

A municipalities utilizing the TGD Environmental (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Systems the average 33-acre landfill can quickly save nearly $10s of millions if not more right away. They can additionally earn 10s or $100s of millions of dollars,even billions of dollars on each landfills. It never ends as humans simply make garbage.

TGD Environmental treats current landfill waste that’s in place over a period of3-5-years using the patented(ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Systems technologies and processes. Once completed we then pull out the remaining bulk of inert materials such as glass, metals, and plastics, which are either recycled, reused, or sent to a less expensive construction and debris (C&D) landfill. With the cell now empty and reconditioned, the landfill is then refilled with new waste and the TGD Environmental (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Systems process is reapplied, followed by subsequent mining events. This is repeated for multiple decades.

TGD Environmental (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Systems not only reduce all the environmental hazards at the landfill, but of greatest significance is that our processes reduce landfill methane, a Greenhouse gas that is 23 times more harmful than CO2 in the atmosphere. Such reductions can be monetized into millions of dollars’ worth of carbon credits, depending on the amount of methane “avoided". The TGD Environmental (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Systems doubles and then more than quintuples when you add in carbon credit offsets to the equation, it literally catapults landfill revenues, into the billions of dollars in un-tapped revenues over today’s non-modernized archaic an aerobic operating Landfills. TGD Environmental (ALBS) technology can be applied at any Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) landfill in the world.

Think about it, where acreage is at a premium, and landfill costs today are high, and where sustainable waste management is desired. The TGD Environmental (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Systems is the solution, as a bonus it’s recognized by the US EPA and five states it’s also registered and approved by the United Nations as a Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).Our emissions reduction methodology generates Certified Emission Reduction units (CERs) which may be traded in emissions trading schemes.Our CDM, is qualified as sustainable development which contributes to the ultimate objective of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which is to prevent dangerous climate change; we help in achieving compliance with their quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

Will your city/county be the showcase, the“Emerald City/County" of the world? To WIN, to be the“Emerald City/County" of the world, you must do business with TGD Environmental. Grab the social praise as the 1st city/county to be Carbon Neutral?

We’re raising startup capital needed by targeting Landfills in the USA and Canada to fund all operations.

We’re a startup company with options

Option One: We utilize our (TGD) True Green Deal Token, by doing an IDO Initial Decentralized Exchange Offering.
Option Two: We reach out to those we know that have already successfully completed Reg A+ success stories. Of course, we’ll have to take the time out and do a Reg A+ as Title IV of the JOBS Act is a type of offering which allows private companies to raise up to $50 Million from the public. Like an IPO, Reg A+ will allow us to offer shares to the general public and not just accredited investors.
Option Three:We move forward with the (CPa) Child Pro mobile app and raise the money we’ll need to fund the entire consortium on our own. 501(C)(3)
Option Four: We accept a two-million-dollar investment, by an angel investor(s). TGD Environmental will provide a 10% return on the investment with principal and interest paid in one year from the date of the investment. Along with the interest payment, Tru Green Deal Corporation will also provide a 2% ownership in TGD Environmental. TGD Environmental will place $1,500,000 of the$2 Million investment in escrow and will need to meet qualified agreed upon milestones approved by the angel investor(s) to release the escrowed funds.

Should we utilize option four for this initial round of funding, we would like a $2,000,000-investment commitment in the form of a hybrid loan to Tru Green Deal Corporation. There will be two rounds of investment funding $500,000 and $1,500,000 both having a 13% interest rate with principal and interest payable in 3 years from the date of each round of funding.

In addition to the interest payment, Tru Green Deal Corporation will issue a seat on the board and a 2% ownership upon the investment funding of round one.

The 2% ownership will be transferred to an approved entity once the total amount of 2,000,000 is added to an investor milestone restricted escrow account.

It is to be agreed that $500,000 of the original investment will be un-incumbered and available to TGD Environmental Corporation to initiate the first landfill project.

To provide security for investors we are willing to accept an investor milestone restricted escrow account in the name of TGD Environmental Corporation. We have no issues with implementing milestones to be reached prior to additional funding provided by the investor(s).

The strategic Canadian landfill business model we have created allows TGD Environmental to fund landfill projects prior to breaking ground for construction.

BEFORE WE EXPLAIN THE MONEY AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS DOCUMENT

You Need To Understand An aerobic vs Sustainable Aerobic Landfill Technologies

There Are Two Basic Types of Landfills

Anaerobic: A landfill deprived of oxygen having odor, leachate, and methane gas issues. Such sites require ongoing perpetual maintenance. The vast majority of landfills worldwide are anaerobic.

Aerobic: A landfill in which organics are rapidly decomposed as a result of the presence of oxygen and moisture. Odor, leachate, and methane emissions are mitigated. Such sites can be recycled as landfills or put to higher use.

Anaerobic Landfill Issues: Traditional landfill operations are anaerobic (no oxygen) and create short and long-term environmental risks to the air, water, and land.

Anaerobic sites release methane into the atmosphere helping to fuel Climate Change by contributing to Global Warming. Air quality is fouled by the intense odors associated with this type of landfill practice.Leachate, a liquid that percolates through an an aerobic landfill and is sometimes toxic, will, over time, penetrate the layers (clay liners, layers of aggregate and geo-textile liners)designed to contain it. The leachate will ultimately enter and contaminate the groundwater.

Organic matter may take up to 100 years or more to fully decompose and stabilize. The non-organic elements such as plastic, glass and rubber will remain intact indefinitely.When a landfill is closed, the surface is unsuitable for most uses other than passive recreational. The site will also require continuous monitoring, leachate maintenance and removal as required.

Conventional Solutions for Anaerobic Landfill Waste

Venting: This is a “Do Nothing" option, which is the state of the vast majority of landfills. Vent stacks are set into sites and methane gas emissions are released directly into the atmosphere. According to the United Nations, landfill methane constitutes about 15% of all greenhouse gas emissions worldwide.

Landfill Gas Capture and Flaring (LFG):

This technology captures and incinerates landfill gases. Methane is converted into heat and carbon dioxide. Studies have shown that this process mitigates less than 40% of the methane on a site. LFG is expensive to setup and operate and the site must be monitored for the life. The remaining methane is vented. Typically, LFG is shut down within 15years because methane production has dropped significantly. Environmental issues are still present.

Landfill Gas to Energy: Under certain conditions, an LFG system can be considered for electrical power generation. The landfill must be very large, and still be operating as a landfill. Fresh waste adds considerably to gas generation and extends the life of the project. Gases must be analyzed for quantity, quality, moisture level, filtration cost and BTU value. The length of time gases will be generated, proximity to the grid, cost of delivery and the market value of the power are other factors that must be considered. Capital and operating costs are exceptionally high, and these sites often show negative returns (see Appendix VII), This technology, as well, does not deal with other environmental issues.

The Anaerobic to Aerobic Solution: The aerobic process is a natural solution and is the most efficient way of mitigating risks and maximizing cost benefits. An aerobic bioreactor can operate on either new or existing landfills

Setup & Operation: On a new site, the landfill would be constructed with a series of traditional but “state of the art" cells that incorporate the latest technology of landfill liners and leachate collection systems. Each “cell" is designed to accommodate one year of material receipts.Material is received, placed into the cell, and heavily compacted. Daily cover material is placed on the site, to discourage pests, similar to traditional anaerobic landfill sites. After the cell is filled, a series of vertical wells are drilled into the surface with dispersion points approximately every 10 feet on the vertical, (for the distribution of both air and moisture). Low-pressure compressors are used to pump air into the waste mass. Leachate,recovered through the traditional collection system, is injected into the waste. Sensors monitor the landfill and record the various gases and temperatures. The resultant data is interpreted and used to optimize the process by controlling the flow rates of air and moisture into each well. Sensor monitoring can be done remotely.

The vertical air and water shafts consist of perforated plastic pipes that extend to the bottom of the waste mass. These wells are interconnected on the surface by flexible plastic pipe through which compressed air is supplied. Leachate and rainwater runoff can be added to the air when it is forced into the shafts. Carbon dioxide and water vapor are released to the atmosphere through vent pipes set at strategic locations between vertical air shafts.

It should be noted that the (ALBS) is better suited at cooler temperatures such as Canada vs warmer temperatures as in California. Simply Canada would take 3 years or less to degrade/ “cook" the (ALBS)where an (ALBS) in California would take a little longer, closer to a 5-year process.

(When you read this document and it says 3-5 years know that is the difference)

Dramatic changes occur almost immediately. Within a few weeks the methane-producing anaerobic bacteria quickly perish and are replaced by aerobic bacteria that break down the organic matter 30 to 60 times faster. Methane gas production ceases and the only emissions are non-toxic carbon dioxide and water vapor. According to the UN, methane(CH4) is 23 times more harmful to air quality than carbon dioxide (CO2). A sign of the positive air quality changes will be rapid growth of plant life on the site.Odors are virtually eliminated. The aerobic degeneration of organic matter is considered“natural" by the United Nations Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Board and follows UN guidelines for emission reductions. The process is similar to the decomposition of leaves on the forest floor or kitchen waste in the backyard composter.

When exposed to oxygen and water, organics are naturally decomposed in about three years and emit very little odor.Leachate is re-circulated back into the landfill, preventing it from compromising the ground water. In addition, the aerobic bacteria improve the quality of the leachate, making it considerably less toxic. Studies have shown that the biological oxygen demand (BOD)decreases from 100,000 to about 10 mg/liter. The optimum operating temperature for the process is 55 degrees C. Since the system operates similar to a “compost" operation, heat is generated and dissipates the leachate as water vapor.

This minimizes the chance of leachate incursion into the groundwater. Leachate is also “cleaned", contains less organic material, and emits fewer odors. As well, the volume of leachate will shrink to the point that outside water maybe required for the aerobic process to continue (wastewater sludge can be substituted). Landfills that have a compromised lining can be taken out of service allowing the area groundwater to be decontaminated.When decomposition is complete, the waste mass can be mined and classified. The waste cell is typically composed of 50% organics, 5% to 7% metals and 30% inert (plastic sand other non-bio degradables).

The process is approximately 95% efficient, dependent on the composition of the waste. The site will NOT revert to an anaerobic state.Including analysis, engineering and operation, an existing anaerobic site can be retro fitted to be aerobic in a matter of months. The cost of this conversion is approximately $6.00per ton of waste in place. Economies of scale have a direct bearing on this cost.

Material Separation

Using mature open pit mining and classification, waste can separate into:

Compost 50%
Metals 5%
Commingled Plastics 12%
Carpet 7%
Glass 3%
Ceramics 2%
Rubber 6%

These percentages are based on older non-blue box sites where tires were accepted. Local collection practices will affect the composition.Other materials (both hazardous and non-hazardous) may be found in a site such as batteries, paint cans, chemical drums, cars, tree stumps and construction materials.

Mining of the site will allow these items to be dealt with in a responsible manner (either removed, recycled, or taken to a hazardous waste facility). Through classification, about55% of the mass can be separated and recycled directly (compost & metals).

Value-Added Products: In conjunction with the National Research Council of Canada, the team of TGD Environmental has developed a process to manufacture “value-added" products from the inert materials such as plastic,carpet, rubber, glass, and ceramic that remain after classification. Products such as railway ties, utility poles, landscaping blocks, marine components and pallets can be created. The products are impervious to weather conditions, non-toxic and cost-effective.The cost to implement this mining and recovery process will range from $12 to $25 per ton. The cost is dependent on the desired speed of recovery and the size of equipment used in the process.

After the usable material is processed into value-added products, about 15% of the total waste mass remains. This unusable material can be taken to a more appropriate site such as a hazardous waste facility or retained for future recycling activities.At the end of approximately four years, the waste has been recycled, made into products,or been consigned to a more appropriate waste disposal area. This compares favorably with a typical anaerobic landfill site, where all of the waste remains in place forever.

Site Reclamation

Once the process is complete, the site can be reconditioned. In a typical landfill, safety features break down over time, and eventually the environment is compromised. With the aerobic process, a cell can be emptied, and liners and leachate systems can be examined and re-conditioned. New landfill approvals are not necessary (a long and costly exercise).Instead, existing sites can be used as “recycling" centers. Sound management practice scan be used to protect the environment.The aerobic bioreactor process is NOT A LANDFILL process, but rather a long-term,sustainable recycling solution, designed to emulate the forces of nature, and mitigate against harmful effects to the environment. It is an exceptionally cost-effective and socially responsible solution to the handling of municipal solid waste.

Equipment and Procedures

The equipment required is readily available in portable or stationary configuration. Large low-cost moveable fabric-covered structures are available to enclose the operation for protection from the weather and contain dust, noise etc.

1. Piping supplies are common drainage materials available at building supply outlets
2. Air and water supply pumps are available at industrial equipment supply outlets.
3. Mechanical separators, sorters and shredders are available from a number of suppliers in many sizes and capacities.
4. Crushing services for concrete, asphalt, and aggregates are available in most communities. Material could be stored until sufficient volume warrants bringing in a mobile crusher or the material could be sold to a gravel operation for crushing offsite. (This is a common service at most gravel pit operations.)
5. Shredding services for lumber, pallets, building materials, trees and other items are available in larger communities to which materials could be sold.
6. Metals can be sold to salvage yards, classified, and sold to smelters.
7. The process generates large volumes of compost. Some may be sold for landscaping use. In many areas having land of marginal agricultural value, the application of compost would enhance the growing of certain crops. Areas with marginal forest cover could be improved with compost to become economical wood or pulp producing land.
8. The processing of the residual plastic and other inert non-salvaged materials can be done either on-site or off-site.

Aerobic Process Advantages

Operational or closed landfills can be used as permanent community recycling facilities.
Closed landfills can be recycled, and the land recovered for higher value uses.
Communities will be able to accommodate their own waste without costly transfers to remote locations with resulting traffic and associated pollution.
New landfills are not required. Existing sites can be recycled, eliminating the need for new infrastructure such as roads, sewers, and utilities.
Landfill size can be substantially reduced. Space to accommodate 5 to 6 years of waste would only be necessary as opposed to traditional landfills designed to hold at least 20 years of waste before requiring closure and perpetual maintenance.
Groundwater contamination is mitigated.
Existing contaminated groundwater can be re mediated.
Leachate is contained and ultimately eliminated prior to any seepage.
Odors, a major NIMBY (not in my back yard) issue, are mitigated.
Safety systems can be examined and repaired when the landfill cells are reconditioned (after the mining process), thus providing reassurance to near by residents that health and safety issues are properly handled and that their quality of life is not compromised.
Valuable economic resources, originally land filled, can be recovered, minimizing the requirement for virgin materials.
Air quality issues are eliminated. The United Nations calculates that about 15% of anthropogenic greenhouse gases are generated from landfills.
The total cost of the aerobic process is approximately $5 per ton of material in the landfill. Mining and recovery costs range from $12 to $25 per ton. Compared with landfill tipping fees the process is economically viable and physically realistic.
Compost extracted from a processed site could be used in a variety of ways -landfill cover, municipal use, community group use, personal use, agricultural use for non-food crops, construction use, and clean fill to name a few. Costs will vary by site and usage.
Alternatives such as incineration require massive capital and operating costs.State of the art incineration facilities with annual capacities of 500,000 tons are estimated to exceed $300 million in capital costs. To process MSW (municipal solid waste), construction and demolition waste as well as commercial waste, the city of Toronto would require at least 5 to 7 such facilities. In addition, operating costs, even after any power grid gains, would be in the range of $150 per ton,almost 3 times the cost of land filling.

Green Box programs could be eliminated. Organic waste would be composted through the aerobic bioreactor and recovered through the mining and classification process. As well, the costs of separate collection and composting facilities would be unnecessary.
The Big Green Box is a nationwide program that offers companies, consumers, and other generators an easy, low-cost way to recycle their batteries and electronics. Each Big Green Box includes the costs of all shipping, handling, and all recycling fees for a one low flat rate (starting at just $36.00).
Blue Box program materials could be assigned to the “recycling facility" and incorporated directly into the manufacture of “value-added" products. Blue box program: The blue box recycling system (BBRS) was initially a waste management system used by Canadian municipalities to collect source separated household waste materials for the purpose of recycling.
Since the process is more environmentally friendly than any alternative,(especially incineration), environmental groups readily embrace the technology.
Landfills footprints can be minimized through recycling and reuse. Developers would embrace the process for conserving land for alternative use.
Closed landfills with environmental issues could be reconditioned at minimal cost.
Existing sites can be recovered for higher value usage.
Wastewater sludge could be processed through the bioreactor reducing the impaction overburdened municipal wastewater treatment facilities.
Pre-sorting of material prior to land filling is possible, however, it is manually intensive, very costly, and extremely hazardous for the workers (chemicals,needles, broken glass, propane tanks and other hazards exist).

Recycling

Any successful recycling project must create products that have value and an available market.

Compost will be the major component. In some jurisdictions, it is graded and approved for specific uses. Ontario has very stringent regulations for compost.The use of compost for commercially grown crops for human consumption will have to be investigated.
Recycled concrete, asphalt and crushed stone have a ready market.
Wood chips have a ready market for a variety of uses: bedding for horses and other livestock, paper and particleboard production, and landscaping applications.
Metals have a well-developed market
Clear glass &colored glass containers have been problematic in recycling but can be incorporated into value-added manufactured products.
Paper, cardboard and other organic elements that pass through the initial aerobic process can be shredded and incorporated into the value-added products that are manufactured.
Waste plastic, carpet, rubber, and similar products have been a major challenge to recyclers. Through the use of a secondary technology, these non-salvage able items can be formed into value-added products. With the inclusion of steel reinforcement, products such as utility poles, fence posts, railroad ties, and wharf and marine components can be produced. The material has many of the attributes of concrete or wood but does not absorb water (no freezing/thawing issues, or salt degradation) and is not affected by algae or other marine life. Depending on its’composition, it can be nailed and cut to size.

Carbon Credits

With the advent of global warming and climate change, conventional wisdom advocates penalties for excessive production of methane, the most common and harmful of the greenhouse gases. The majority of carbon offset programs worldwide are “cap & trade"systems whereby polluters such as coal-fired electrical generators are given annual emission thresholds they must strive to meet. If annual methane emissions fall under the threshold, then credits are issued. If thresholds are exceeded, then penalties are imposed.Polluters must pay the penalties or purchase credits from firms or projects (such as aerobic landfill projects) that have credits available. Penalties typically increase year over year and supply and demand dictates the price of the credits. Carbon exchanges have evolved for the trading of credits. “Cap & trade" systems provide the best incentive to encourage polluters to get their houses in order.Typically, every ton of landfill waste generates about 1.4 tons of methane. The aerobic bioreactor technology reduces that output by approximately 85%. Therefore, one ton of landfill waste is roughly equal to one carbon offset credit. Other methods (gas capture & flaring and LFG energy generation) fall well short of the aerobic process in terms of green house gas mitigation and thus generate significantly less credits.

In Alberta, penalties for the first year of the provincial carbon reduction program have been set at $50 per ton of methane emitted above the allowable limit. The market will likely see initial carbon offsets trading in the $10 to $12 range.Carbon offset credits provide the economic driver to fund the aerobic process. This means that a landfill owner can have a site re mediated at NO COST.

Current Status in Canada(We believe California will follow this model)

Alberta was the first province in Canada to adopt a carbon trading mechanism. Baseline Emissions of Calgary drafted and presented the aerobic landfill protocol to Albert a Environment. Baseline is the recognized leader in Canada in the field of carbon emission systems and technologies. Baseline developed the protocol standards, co-authored the Alberta trading system legislation and wrote almost all of the 25+ accepted protocols.In December of 2007, Baseline was retained by Environment Canada to evaluate over 350 various Carbon Protocols from trading systems worldwide. Each protocol was graded on a point total of 27. The TGD Environmental (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System process received a grade of25.5, placing it in the top 20, and ensuring it of being a primary protocol for the Federal government.

In early February of 2008, the Province of Ontario retained Baseline to establish GHG protocols for Ontario. The deadline for completion is early April 2008. The TGD Environmental (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bio reactor System process is one of the protocols that the province has adopted.

Ontario has implemented a carbon reduction trading system Baseline has openly opposed the proposed Ontario mandate of gas flaring for land fills over 1.5 Million tons. They argue that such legislation is contrary to the public good and will inhibit the normal development of a GHG trading system. It is suspected that the proposed legislation will go forward.The TGD Environmental (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bio reactor System is considered to be the most effective carbon mitigation technology in Canada. It produces more carbon reductions, faster and at less cost than any other technology.Why is this important? Because efficient carbon reduction not only mitigates more green house gases, but also becomes the economic driver to offset the cost of implementing the aerobic technology.By employing an aerobic bioreactor, the value of the generated credits would offset the cost of implementing and operating the system. In essence, the system would be cost free.

TECHNOLOGY ADVANTAGES OF THE TGD ENVIRONMENTAL (ALBS)AEROBICLANDFILL BIOREACTOR SYSTEM

Elimination of greenhouse gases
Landfill life greatly extended
Landfills can be reused as recycling centers (becoming assets - not liabilities).
Groundwater contamination is mitigated
Existing contaminated groundwater can be re mediated.
Closed landfills can be recycled or recovered for higher value uses.
Communities can recycle their own waste without costly transfers to other sites
New landfill approval and related infrastructure requirements are eliminated
Existing landfill footprints can be dramatically reduced, requiring space for only 5 to6 years of waste
Post-closure perpetual maintenance is eliminated
Odors, a major “not in my back yard (NIMBY)" issue, are mitigated.
Leachate is contained and ultimately eliminated prior to any seepage.
Safety systems can be examined and repaired after the landfill is mined
Valuable resources are recovered, minimizing the requirement for virgin materials.
Air quality is vastly improved
Compost can be used for daily cover, municipal use, personal use, agricultural use for non-food crops,construction use, and clean fill.
Only one collection stream is required
Costly blue box & green box programs could be eliminated
Alternatives such as incineration require massive capital and operating costs.
Environmental groups would embrace the concept
Developers would embrace the process for conserving land for alternative use.
Closed landfills, with environmental issues, could be re mediated at minimal cost.
Landfills having higher value land use can be made more productive.
Wastewater sludge can be processed through the bioreactor, reducing the impact on already overburdened municipal wastewater treatment facilities.
Pre-sorting of recyclables, a manually intensive, costly, and extremely hazardous process for workers (chemicals, needles, broken glass, propane tanks and other hazards) could be eliminated.

Conclusion

TGD Environmental (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System and related ancillary technologies provide a cost-effective,environmentally friendly, sustainable solution to the problems associated with waste collection,recycling, water quality, climate change and quality of life.

Many capital-intensive operations associated with waste collection and disposal(municipal waste, municipal sludge, blue box program, green box program) can be combined into one low-cost solution for the greater good.Environmental issues such as greenhouse gas emissions, odors, and water and soil contamination, can be mitigated. Land use can be optimized through the reclamation of both operating and closed landfills. Some of the issues of the outdated Traditional Anaerobic Landfill

Traditional landfills are anaerobic. Waste material is compacted and covered daily with material to discourage pests as well as to control odors. Once a cell is filled, it is“capped", generally with an impervious layer of clay that prevents air and moisture from entering the landfill mass. Anaerobic bacteria thrive and slowly decompose the organic matter. Under these conditions, it could take well over a hundred years to decompose the organics.

Methane gas and pungent odors (both byproducts of anaerobic decomposition)are generated and slowly escapes through the clay cap designed to contain them. The land is generally unstable and not suitable for any use other than surface leisure activities such as golf courses.Most anaerobic landfills require perpetual monitoring and maintenance. Gases and leachate need to be dealt with as required. Sites will slump and need to be leveled to control weeds and grass. Installation of vents may also be necessary. These post-closure costs are borne by the landfill owner and typically passed on to the customer (taxpayer).

Incorporating an Aerobic Bioreactor: An anaerobic landfill is analyzed to determine the compaction rate of the site (the amount of waste in weight per yard), the composition of the waste, the amount of leachate and flow rates, as well as gas predictions. Once the analysis has been done, an aerobic bioreactor system can be designed.A series of “wells" are drilled into the surface of the landfill in a grid pattern. Individual pipes are used at each wellhead for each 10 feet of depth into the landfill. If the waste mass is 40 feet deep, then pipes will be inserted to the 10, 20 and 30-foot levels. Low-cost ABS plastic pipe is used to circulate moisture (leachate is preferred) into the landfill.

Air is also injected into the waste through another set of wells using low-pressure compressors and inexpensive “Big O" drainage pipe.When air is pumped in, the anaerobic bacteria quickly perish and are rapidly replaced by aerobic bacteria. The transformation from anaerobic to aerobic typically occurs within 2to 3 weeks.

Aerobic bacteria aggressively decompose the organic matter. Carbon in waste combines with oxygen in the air to produce carbon dioxide and heat. Methane production ceases. Odors virtually disappear. A typical aerobic landfill is “composted" within 24 to36 months. Aerobic decomposition is 30 to 60 times faster than the anaerobic process.There are several additional advantages beyond the rapid stabilization of the landfill.

Leachate that percolates through the landfill is re-circulated back into the site,minimizing the opportunity for it to breach the protective systems designed to contain it.
Leachate contains dissolved organics, which are also processed by the aerobic bacteria, which significantly improves leachate quality, particularly the Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) levels.
Because the process generates substantial heat, much of the leachate is vented into the atmosphere in the form of water vapor. This effectively reduces the quantity of leachate and minimizes the possibility of a safety system failure.
When the aerobic process is finished, the landfill is stabilized, the organic matter is composted and the site “slumps". This settling action can recapture up to 25%of the original airspace.
Post-closure maintenance costs are significantly reduced.

Comparative Summary of ALBS Landfill to Status Quo Landfill

Description	Status Quo	ALBS	Notes
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions	Average landfill waste emit approximately 432,000 cubic feet of LFG per day. Of that amount, 45-50% is methane by volume	> 90% reduction in less than 3 months	The air that is injected contains oxygen, which is toxic to methane producing bacteria; therefore, methane production is avoided.
Foul Odors	Hydrogen Sulfide, Ammonia, Mercaptans	Compost, earthy aroma	Similar to wastewater treatment process at publicly owned treatment plants (POTWs)
Leachate (Liquids) Production	Can produce up to 1,000 gallons per day at some sites	100% elimination	Due to higher waste operating temperatures (165 degrees F)
Leachate Toxins	Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)	Has reduced BOD from 10,000 ppm to less than 100 ppm	Similar to wastewater treatment process at POTWs
Waste/ Leachate Pathogens	Consistently present in waste and leachate	Mortality in less than 24 hours	Due to higher waste operating temperatures (165 degrees F)
Waste degradation time frame/ Site Redevelopment Potential	Decades, if not 100 years or more, due to slow anaerobic decay	Less than 5 years, due to faster aerobic decay	Old landfills can be developed for real estate purposes much faster than
Opportunity for Landfill Mining (LFM)?	No, due to presence of pathogens and methane	Yes, due to significant reduction of pathogens and methane via the ALBS	Over 20 LFM projects have been conducted to date globally
Opportunity to recycle landfill materials?	No, as waste is buried	Yes, due to LFM and reduction of pathogens and methane	Recovered materials (glass, metals, etc.) can be combined into ongoing recycling programs to help meet recycling mandates.
Post Closure Care (PCC)/ PCC Costs	30 Years or more, by mandate	Reduced or Eliminated Completely (100%)	Due to reduced BOD, VOCs, pathogens, and GHG via ALBS. Such data provides the basis to request relief from prescriptive PCC mandates.
Opportunity to Monetize GHG emissions	Yes.	Yes, at a higher spot price	Alberta price for GHG offsets are above $50 per ton CO2Eq
Opportunity to Reuse Landfill airspace/extend landfill life?	No. Once the landfill fills, it must be expanded or closed,then PPC begins	Yes, due to ALBS and LFM, the landfill waste can be removed,	Known as The Sustainable Landfill recycled, and the airspace refilled to repeat the process.

http://www.eesi.org/papers/view/fact-sheet-landfill-methane

Assumptions:

5-10 year Brown (closed) Landfill Acreage:	• 33 acres
Landfill Volume:	• 1,000,000 tons
Amount of GHG emission reduction over project (3-5 years)	• 1,200,000 tons carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2EQ)

Now our Revenue Model Prediction Formulations

3 Landfills in Year One
15 Landfills in Year Two
50 Landfills in Year Three
100 Landfills in Year Four
200 Landfills in Year Five

TGD Environmental maybe aggressive in the number of landfills in Years Four and Five. However, we have already identified 45 landfills that are interested in our technology and there are six landfills that would like us to start cleaning up their landfills in 2018.

In our cost model, we believe our total costs for a landfill project is conservative at 8-$12 million per average landfill. ($8 million with used brownfield equipment and $11-12 million with new equipment)

TGD Environmental believes that we will be able to reduce the number of years to complete this process from five years down to three years or less. This would reduce the overall cost greatly. Plus, we would be able reuse equipment saving a millions in capital purchase at new landfill sites. Our goal is to reduce the cost per landfill site to $8 million.

Revenue sources – We believe that our estimate of revenue carbon credits is quite conservative, and our goal will be to maximize these revenue with the financing help of investment partners. The longer that we are able to hold onto carbon credits, the higher the rates are going up in the marketplace.

We would expect additional projects to begin in 3 - 6-month intervals after January 1st, 2022.

Alberta Canada Carbon Credits in 2022 are $50 per ton (Blue) to rise an expected additional $15 per year to be at $170 per ton by 2030.
We can pre-sale carbon credits in Canada as soon as an MOU is completed.
California carbon credits just recently Set an all-time Record Price in Cap-and-Trade Auction at $34.01it is expected they will continue rising at record levels.

Click Here

In the U.S. we will begin harvesting carbon credits in about 1.5 years mid-2023. History and the current intent of California as an example wanting and advertising across the state to be carbon neutral within 5 years you could expect pricing to be between $50 and $80 per ton as we begin harvesting with our California municipality partners.

Note: Should we elect to we move quickly with an investor(s) it should be known:

Upon receiving a(LOI) Letter Of Interest with any local landfill/municipality we will then be able to formulate a complete plan with exact dates, timelines, names addresses etc. to formulate a (MOU) Memorandum of

Understanding agreements with all parties involved. Next, we will produce a Project Overview Document (POD).

After the (LOI), (MOU) and (POD) is all is agreed upon and consummated the unverified Carbon Credits become available for sale once the Carbon Credit buyer is accepted by TGD Environmental a separate “Surety Bond" also known as a Contract or Construction Bond is to be placed on each landfill to cover the total cost of all development, construction, and operational cost for a period of up to 5 years equaling $10 – 15 Million per landfill project to ensure all parties involved are protected. At a meeting of all parties involved funding a transfers, and final documents are to be completed and construction begins at this time.

Note:

Considering the average landfill is 33-acre after completion of the above processes of an initial Canadian Landfill project we is expected we would have a minimum of 600,000 unverified carbon credits available to be sold. We would allow a sale at approximately a 50% discount of the current 2023 market price of $65 to an accepted Carbon Credit Buyer this totals just under $20 million dollars, more than enough to cover all expenses of the initial Canadian landfill project with the remaining carbon credits still to be harvested at a higher increased cost of $80-$95 market price once the project is fully functional.

As we launch, we will be bringing multiple projects together at the same time. By having multiple (LOI)accepted buyers will feel confident to invest in the carbon Credits prior to having them issued by the Alberta Emission Offset Registry (AEOR).

Once the remaining Unverified Carbon credits are issued/listed by the Canadian registry within 60 – 90 days of a (MOU) Memorandum Of Understanding being consummated by all parties.

There is still the balance of the development and operational cost to complete the project we would only need 134,000 GHG tons = $4 million 165,000 = $5 million 200,000 = $6 million Held as collateral for bond:

Although there would be $6 million invested into the project once the sale of 600,000 carbon credits to the Buyer(s) is finalized there would be a remaining $4 -$6 million balance due on the project which is the reason for the associated bond.

If we defaulted for any reason,then we could make our Project Position claimable, and all parties investors and developers, bond holders, all parties of the original (MOU) are protected.

1.) The 600,000 tons the (POD) suggested that the registry did not issue would still come from the landfill that will, receive executable numbers from the registry after the landfill project is fully functional worth an estimated $20 Million of which approximately only $4 - $6 million would still be outstanding.

2.) A $10 - $15 million Contract bonds would be needed at an estimated cost of1%-5% sense the project has little or no risk. Approximately $300k - $450k.

The Landfill business timelines, bonds,and the money

Based on data collected during research we have conducted on our initially targeted Landfills in Alberta Canada approximately 1.2 million tons of Carbon Credits exist per landfill.

We used the 1.2 million as a baseline for this proposal.

Alberta has ruled we can presale 50% of the Carbon Credits Approved by the Alberta Emission Offset Registry (AEOR) against the Project Overview Document (POD).

This totals 600,00O Carbon Credit tons valued in January 2022 at $65 each or as an estimated unverified discounted carbon credit price of 50% of that value to buyer worth$32.50 each = $19,500,000. The Buyer of the Carbon Credits would invest $19,500,000transferring ownership of the first 600k Carbon Credits to the buyer.

This $19,500,000. Covers the $6 Million development cost and the first year of operation which will be transferred to the construction developers of the TGD Environmental (ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System at the closing table discussed above.

Meetings held in Maitland FL.it was agreed development and operation cost of an TGD Environmental(ALBS) Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System covering the development cost and the first year of operation would be $6 million. Additional funding to complete 3-5 years of operation would be an additional $4 - $6 Million due at the end of the first year of operations.

$19,500,000. Dollars is collected via the pre-sale the carbon credits above.

- $6,000,000. Development & 1^st year Operations to be transferred when sold

= $13,500.000. Remaining

-$500,000. Provided to arrive at this point. Presentation, Letter of Interest, Initial project analysis,(LOI) Letter of Intent, Economic Study, (MOU) Memo of Understanding, funding commitments, approval processes, (POD) Project Overview Document, contract phase, 3rd party travel, attorneys, approved expenses in general.

$13,000,000.This remaining revenue is shared between the Investors, the municipality & TGD Environmental

Our initial goal is to settle on 3-4 landfill projects during Q-1, 2022. After a closing table meeting of all parties involved in each landfill and the projects are funded commitments are met development of each (ALBS) begins it should be noted that 90-120 after the fully functional operations of our initial project has been completed.

It is at this time the Alberta Emission Offset Registry (AEOR) will issue verified carbon credit numbers to the registry in the amount of the 600,000 Balance of Carbon Credits when The additional 50% of Carbon Credits proposed by the original Project Overview Document (POD) was originally posted as unverified carbon credits when documentation was provided, listed, completed to the Canadian Registry.

(Note: during the first year of operation the Landfill is monitored to provide the offset of Carbon Credit emissions reports for the (AEOR).

Every 3 months the landfill is measured to produce a new baseline.

(The baseline tells you how many carbon credits have been avoided and each is issued a number to be available to the open market to be purchased)

The 600,000 Balance of Carbon Credits (AEOR) issued from Canadian Registry are credited as they to be immediately sold at full market price of $65-$80 depending on the baseline measurement date of the landfill at a value of roughly $39 million more easily more than enough to pay the remaining balance of the $4 - $6 million needed to complete the 3-5 years of operation.

Q-2 2022is the 1 year beginning of construction and development of the landfill project with operations beginning on Q-2 2023 with 1^st year operations ending Q-2 2024 at which time the entire balance of any outstanding debts owed by TGD Environmental for this initial project are to be paid out from the remaining $13,000,000. From the original sale of the Carbon Credits or the now Verified Carbon Credits with a value of over $39 million.

We would expect additional projects to begin in 3 - 6-month intervals after Q-2 2022.

Each Landfill must complete the following steps to launch:

Step #1 Complete Landfill Checklist
Step #2 Complete Landfill Evaluation
Step #3 Letter of Intent – We will provide a sample LOI to Canadian Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Landfill
Step #4 Complete a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) – We already have Boiler Plate version from previous projects. November.
Step #5 List Project on the CSA Registries website
http://www.csaregistries.ca/albertacarbonregistries/home.cfm
Step #6 Produce a Project Overview Document (POD) - We already have Boiler Plate version from previous projects. November.
Step #7 Sale of Carbon Credits to a Carbon Credit Buyer – It is a Seller’s Market – Experience tells us the Alberta Emission Offset Registry (AEOR) will approve 50% of the of the Landfill Carbon Credits proposed by the POD.

Upon reception of the completed detailed Landfill Checklist and consummating LOI’s with local Landfill municipalities we will then be able to formulate a complete plan with exact dates, timelines, names addresses, etc. Prior to approval of a LOI we would like to identify a qualified partner to issue a letter of commitment so as to allow TGD Environmental to promote the ability to guarantee to the municipality the development and operation of the (ALBS) for a period of 3-5 years. Upon approval and acceptance of a LOI and the pre-sale of the Carbon Credits it is a this point we would need an active Contract Bond to be implemented to each project.

After a Memorandum of Understanding is completed, we are proposing we consummate transact /execute all paperwork and at the same time between all parties involved within the project the local Canadian Landfill Municipality, SALT, LGAS, & TGD Environmental, the Contract Bond issuer and the buyer of the Carbon Credits. By having Multiple LOI a buyer will feel confident to invest in the carbon Credits prior to having them issued by the Alberta Emission Offset Registry (AEOR).

Held as collateral for bond:

The $6 million that has been invested into the project. If we defaulted on the $4 -$6 million balance due on the project, then we could make our Project Position claimable.
The 600,000 tons the POD suggested that the registry did not issue would still come from the Landfill that will, receive executable numbers from the registry on January 1st, 2019, worth an estimated $13.5 Million U.S. of which approximately only $4 - $6 million is outstanding.

“OUR GUESS IS $10 - $20 MILLION IN CONTRACT BONDS WOULD COST AN ESTIMATED 3% OR APPROXIMATELY $300K - $600K. SINCE THE INDUSTRY AVERAGE IS 1%-5% AND THIS HAS LITTLE OR NO RISK"

(As you can see simply 3 landfills will provide $3,561,600.00 more than enough needed to complete and launch the TGD Consortium.)

(If the graph above is hard to read, simply “Zoom" in and enlarge this document.)

Timelines with the initial ALBS Project/ Carbon Credit Process

Participants:

TGD Environmental Management Team & Investor(s)
Municipality- Landfill Owner/ Directors (Initial GHG credits Owner)
3rd Party Engineering Firm for Landfill Design Support (contracted by Municipality)
3rd Party Construction/ALBS Operation Firm (contracted by Municipality)
Environment- Regulator
Broker- GHG Sales Broker
Buyer- GHG Buyer

	Milestone	Description	Date/ Duration (days)	Cost $x1000 (est.)
A	Funding- 1st Round	TGD Environmental receives initial funding to cover mostly administration, contract, and submit tals development costs.	14
B	Submission of Feasibility Study (FS)	TGD Environmental submits to Municipality a Feasibility Study (FS) outlining the benefits and costs of the ALBS. If the Directors approve, then projects moves forward. If not, project stops.	7	15
C	Letter of Intent (LOI)	A formal commitment letter from the Municipality Landfill Directors showing committing to the project concept.	7	4
D	Project Overview Document (POD)	TGD Environmental prepares and submits to the Directors a Project Overview Document (POD), a detailed analysis of the project. POD includes environmental, social, economic outputs and estimated costs. Will also be used for regulatory and GHG sales purposes as well.	30	70
E	Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)	TGD Environmental prepares a MOU between TGD Environmental and the Landfill Directors which outlines the terms and conditions in which the project will move forward. It allows the NGD Environmental team to seek the additional project funding commitments necessary to implement and operate the project and to assess the economic viability of the project. It will outline the revenue sharing and any financial commitment by the landfill (if any). It assumes that if all conditions, terms, and regulatory approvals are met then the project will be implemented.	20	2
F	Funding- 2nd Round	Second round of funding for the project is committed to: Prove intent to execute project (escrowed) Validating and verifying carbon credits, unless, based on the documents prepared between Milestones A and E, the credits are pre-sold to a Buyer before the validation/verification/ registration process begins. Also, Landfill Directors to assign carbon credits to NGD. NGD then contacts GHG Brokers to seek out GHG Buyers, independent from project approval process, for possible sale or pre-sale.	15-60
G	Verified Project Plan, Project Report, Verification Report, Greenhouse Gas Assertion,__________ Emission Offset Registration	TGD Environmental lists project on the _____ Emission Offset Registry (AEOR), along with the required documentation, which includes: a third party verified project plan and project report, a verification report, and a greenhouse gas assertion. Registered projects are then able to be issued unique serial numbers assigned to carbon offset credits allocated to a registered project. These documents are posted publicly on the registry.	60	45
H	Credits Sold	With Buyer found, project funds released and final contract signing between the Landfill Directors and TGD Environmental.	14	2
I	Project Contract	The project contract signed between Landfill Directors and TGD Environmental per terms, conditions and approvals outlined in the MOU. Landfill Directors officially assign the gas / credit rights to the TGD Environmental team. The Project Contract begins per project schedule with design, implementation, and operation of the project. Contracts for 3rd party support services executed.	14	35
J	Design, Implementation and Operation	The TGD Environmental Team initiates the final design, implementation, and operational forecast to cover the project over the next 3-5 years to achieve the project goals, including credit generation in accordance with the Project Contract.	120	80
K	Project Completion	The project is deemed completed when the aerobic process can no longer economically degrade the organic waste. This means that all economically viable carbon reduction credits will have been generated.	36 to 60 months

Note 2:Once TGD Environmental is launched

rMost Valuable Captive Insurance could easily after the first month of operation replace the Contract bond being held as collateral.
The deposits to TGD Financials's via the CPa will be approximately $35 Million dollars’ month one. More than enough to finance all desired projects.
If we start development of the TGD Environmental projects on January 1st, 2017, it will take 4-6 months of development and regulatory to launch the consortium, which puts us on June 1st, 2017, and we have more than enough funding for all projects to be self-funded 18 months prior to January 2019 when the Contract/Performance Bond would be implemented should TGD Environmental default on its $4 - $6 Million-dollar obligation due in January 2019

(What we are saying is the risk is nothing once you consider Note 1: and Note 2: above.)

TGD Environmental Marketing Plan as part of the TGD Consortium:

In order to market TGD Environmental and have the (ALBS) technology implemented into Landfills nationwide and across the globe, we will use the power of the TGD Consortium. Communities for Education (CFE), the heart of the TGD Consortium, Inc. to support us in a technologically connected world, BNK Guru to financially fund all our projects as needed. All this is insured via ur Sisters our captive insurance company. All together ensuring success. (CFE) is the business member within the Consortium that we use to voice TGD Environmental socially and politically, and to resonate a true presence within our communities to affect real change. Communities for Education is TGD Consortium’s “Boots on the Ground" warriors. They are the bridge that connects the community together.

(CFE) recruits top community influencers to be ambassadors. They are and become a presence, attending community meetings and events to protect children and families while building resources used, shared between and to convene business, industry, and government. To enhance our approach and begin to build consensus around the “Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System" (ALBS) the voices needed to identify what success looks like. To better understand what problems may arise. What the timelines are going to be, who it affects, and the direction

we need to take so we can consummate a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreement a legal and binding document.

SHARED CHALLENGES DEMAND SHARED ACTIONS

Every project begins with the mission of bringing people and ideas together in pursuit of real solutions. Processes and actions emphasize, security, strong foundational data, how crowd sourced data will be re-used across all our tied industries.

Every business within the TGD Consortium is part of the conversation.
We pull leadership together for collaboration and to share common goals.
We design results-oriented plans to guide the transformation from ideas into reality.

How TGD Environmental Launches into a Community as part of TGD Consortium

Step #1

We begin by isolating regional and local influencers within communities and create a Team Leader.We begin with TGD Environmental.

Step #2

Team Leader completes a Landfill Checklist for the community. The checklist helps Communities for Education (CFE) to evaluate how best to move forward within the community with an ideally executable, Community Launch Plan. The Community Launch Plan will also provide (CFE) all the demographic data of the community and will thoroughly outline the strengths within the community as well as the areas of opportunity. Actionable planning and leadership is key.

Step #3

TGD Environmental completes an evaluation of the Landfill Checklist. Communities with Landfill’s that are scheduled to close within 4 - 5 years are the best prospects. There are 1600 Operating Landfills in the USA and 50k closed Landfills (Brown Fields).

Step #4

Once we have a Landfill targeted, we use the data collected from the Landfill Evaluation to produce preliminary documents to enhance our approach and begin to build consensus around the “Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor System" (ALBS). We convene stakeholders, government, industry, and the voices needed to identify what success looks like. To better understand what problems may arise. What the timelines are going to be, who it affects, and the direction we need to take so we can consummate a (MOU) Memorandum of Understanding agreement a legal and binding document.

Step #5

Once an (MOU) agreement is in place, we fund the ground game of (CFE). We onboard additional top community influencers (Our A- Team (Ambassadors) and surround them with Volunteers. We voice ourselves socially and politically using all types of media TV, Radio, Social Platforms Meetings, local state, government, conferences you name it, meetings, and media of all types.

The average landfill is 33 acres hold 1 million tons of garbage and puts off 1.2 million carbon Credits. We are currently allowed to presale 50% of the carbon credits. Equaling 600,000 carbon credits valued at $50 per each or $30 Million. If we discount them by 50% as they are unverified carbon offset credits that have not come out of the ground as at this time,as we have not even broke ground on the Landfill project.

Once an (MOU) is consummated by all parties the car on credits can be utilized to lower the cost of the bond (Contract Bonds are normally 1-5% depending on the assets guaranteeing the bond) in this case the 600,000 carbon credits worth at least $15 million. Once the landfill is constructed and operational.

1 year from the date of the agreed upon Memorandum of Understanding is consummated it will take approximately 1 year to complete the landfill and make it operational. Once completed every 3 months a new landfill baseline (baseline means the landfill is measured) is generated and now the new car on credit offsets are verified Carbon Credits worth a premium. Keep in mind the remaining 600,000 carbon credits go up in value (approximately $15) every year

Even if discounting the 600,000 carbon credits worth $30 million at 50% that value is $15 million or more than enough to cover all development, construction, and operational cost for the 3-5 years of the landfill project.

of the they are valued at even as a prospective carbon credit buyer is accepted as there will be buyer, seller negotiations.

The $15 million receive approximately $15 Million Dollars on Closed Landfills and Over $20 Million Dollars on operating Landfills on average here in the USA. TGD Environmental provides roughly 10% of its revenues as a marketing expense to support the CFE boots on the ground warriors. The $500,000 - $2 Million provided to CFE for each Landfill is more than enough to support a community and expand operations into additional communities.

Step #6

We now use 10% of rGreen Landfill’s profit to fund and launch the TGD Consortium. It is (CFE) the business within the Consortium that creates the ability to become a voice within each community and accomplish our mission. We are the bridge that connects the community together. We recruit top community influencers to be ambassadors. We become a presence, attending community meetings and events to protect children and families while building resources that can be used and shared between every family and business in the community. Again, make sure to read the accompanying documentation for Communities for Education (CFE) and the other consortium members Mini Business plan for a clear picture of the greatness the consortium holds. With regards to landfills here in the USA.

A couple Florida Examples:

Using an average Landfill size of 33 acres, the Landfill owners realize an increase in revenues from $XXX Million to $XX billion, while we take in $XX Million in revenue in the process. Closed Landfills Gain $XXX Million in additional revenue and we take in $X Million in revenue. We are the market disruptor, having the pending patents and the required experience. Not anyone can design and operate such a system. Our on-board global experts and Inventors have more than 30 years’ experience leading hundreds of remediation and assessment projects in the US and around the world at hazardous waste, industrial, and Landfill facilities. We are unique in that, over the past 10 years, we are the only ones who have conducted the necessary studies and delivered the proof-of-concept needed to show the reduction of risk at Landfills as well as the multiple benefits, including new revenues. Most importantly we have proved that this approach is scalable and can be used at any municipal solid waste Landfills in the world. In short- it is ready to be globally commercialized.

Given that few people desire to have new a Landfills near them, the Not-In-My- Backyard (NIMBY), effect, it can take over ten years to obtain a permit for a new Landfill. However, the bioreactor/Landfill re-use approach is extremely attractive to owners, especially at sites with growing populations, as re-use of the same site does not need a new permit. Therefore, it does not take much to get things started- simply the property player, who is tired of the constant hustle, needs to submit a value proposition.

There are over 1,600 active and over 50,000 closed Landfills in the US, with many more in Canada. We have been successful at eight sites so far at a moderate scale and are ready to scale up to larger sites to increase financial returns. Our Senior Partner is Lead Inventor on 3 related patents and managed each project. At present, along with our partners we have developed a commercial sized Landfill in Alberta Canada, whereby the TGD Environmental is implemented. rGreen, the Partners are leaders in innovative bioremediation projects. Today, the pieces are all in place for our Orlando, Florida team to take Land filling to the next sustainable step. Selected Florida Examples:

Orange County, Florida has a 113-acre Landfill located on _____ acres of property. The current permitted capacity to bury waste for 50 years using up most of this area. If the ALBS technology is used, the County could reuse the ¬¬¬____ acres and not have to develop the remaining ____ acres into Landfill. If the current volume, 5 million tons, was reused 5 times, the net usable volume would be over 25 million. At $37 per ton disposal fee, the Landfill would realize an additional $____ million (4 x 5 million tons’ x $37/ton)
They have also has set aside $___ Million for closure of its Landfill once filled. Of this amount, $__ million is for “post-closure care." (PCC), mainly for monitoring for 30 years. If the technology is used, risks are reduced and thus less monitoring is needed. As such, PCC costs can be reduced by 1/3 while we receive 10% of the technology benefits. Further, airspace can be reused, and Greenhouse gases reduced.
Last, as property neighbors are complaining of the smell, the technology can abate this smell as well, saving the County millions more dollars and improving public relations.
Palm Beach County, Florida has a 65-acre closed Landfill the city would like to reclaim to generate new tax revenues. The property is very valuable, once re mediated using the technology. Our Bioreactor is the perfect fit.

With TGD Environmental and the TGD Consortium, the possibilities are truly endless.

TGD Environmental as a lead member in the TGD Environmental creates a path for real success. We change lives! We support the community as a whole! We help bring focus to personal safety, education, bullying, suicide, drugs, personal finance management tools, goal setting/achievement we specialize supporting local businesses. We help produce a loud voice, a force for social good, community wide. Our actions and accomplishments, leave behind lessons the whole world can embrace to accomplish pure social good.

What’s needed after funding:

Step #1 is setting in motion an already established initial Landfill Plan – As developers we will be stepping into an existing landfill project. We will be negotiating and adjusting the documentation needed to acquire, develop, and meet all regulatory compliance. Everything needed will be completed by the TGD Environmental team. All documentation surrounding the processes, development, design, and implementation of our Aerobic Landfill we already understand and will complete.

TGD Environmental already has the recipe for greatness and most everything templated. We will modify our documentation and templates when needed to quickly take on new projects. TGD Environmental completely understands exactly what is needed and the expenses as seen in the Landfill Project 1 Excel Spreadsheet site accompanying this documentation. Development and construction of an Aerobic Bioreactor, we know everything inside and out. Additionally, we have close relationships with the regulators making the decisions over all the landfills within the initial province we are romancing. Our close relationships within the landfill industry will allow us to complete not only our initial landfill projects but additional landfill projects as well.

We will be negotiating and adjusting the documentation needed to acquire, develop, and meet all regulatory compliance. We have Letters of Intent (LOI) ready that need to be consummated, once this is completed and in place then the next step is re-generating an expired baseline (Baselines are a measurement of Methane tonnage within the Landfill), at this point a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is established.

Once the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is completed. It is at this point each project is submitted for approval to the government’s province, once the landfill project is approved the law allows us the ability to Pre-Sale up to 50% of the carbon credits prior to construction.

We expect after the completion of our first or second project we will be granted the ability to pre-sale the carbon credits will rise the current 50% to 100% presale before breaking ground.

Using our presale model, with our currently targeted first landfill, we would collect $18 Million before breaking ground. The cost of the entire project over a 3-5-year completion is $10 -$12 Million for a net of approximately $6 Million.

Otherwise, if we do not presale the Carbon Credits, we would spend $10 - $12 Million and collect $60 Million and net out $38-$40 Million on our first project.

Our first projects previous baseline was completed and has now expired. The original baseline on what is to be our first project, documented 1.2 million tons within the first landfill project. Current Carbon Credits are valued at $50 per-ton. In 2021 the value of carbon Credits rises to $50 per-ton.

1.2 Million ton’s x $50. Per-ton = $60 Million. If we discount the Carbon Credits to 60% of their value and presale them prior to collecting them from ground and before we even break construction. The presale of the Carbon Credits is currently allowed once we have the (MOU) in hand and the Landfill Project is accepted by the province. $50 Million X .60% = $36 Million

We are currently allowed to presale 50% of the Carbon Credits at 60% of their Value which is $18 Million dollars, and the cost of the completed landfill project is roughly $10-12 million dollars in total. Going forward we know we can get Landfill cost into the $8 Million-dollar range.

We intend on incentivizing and preselling 1000’s of projects throughout the world going forward to include both types of our reactors. Each municipality will invest roughly $40 Million. Our model provides the municipalities with a 2.5-year payback while at the same time greatly multiplying their revenues. It will also provide those communities with fully funded high educations for their children and the ability to breath much cleaner air and a higher quality of water.

The community leadership will also have more revenue to enhance the quality of life for all!

Initial draws of funding from the round one escrow account in the name of TRUE Deal Corporation will be used toward travel and miscellaneous expenses to initiate and consummate the first landfill project.

Once a completed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is in place with the first Municipality it is at this point the remaining balance of round one funding will be used to complete the structuring and development of all entities needed to properly execute all plans of each entity within the TGD Consortium.

By having the TGD Environmental in place we greatly speed up our sales process in establishing new landfill projects.

Parents simply vote for Clean Air and Clean Water via our Child Pro App within their communities.

Although all individuals within the community want Clean Air and Clean Water there is a lot more powerful reason for all individuals to reach out to those politicians affecting their lives within the local government via our Child Pro App.

The (CPa) Child Pro App allows parents, grandparents aunts, and uncles, to call, vote or show up to city council meetings to speak with or voice their opinions with their local Politicians. The (CPa)Child Pro App provides among other things crowdfunding for education. Higher Educations for all children within a community.

The Child Pro App provides the ability for parents, grandparents aunts, and uncles together to be a loud voice for landfill change within the community.

Parents, grandparents’ aunts, and uncles as well as the local politicians all have children and the biggest reason they vote for clean air and clean water, is to provide their children with Fully Funded Higher Educations.

Why pay for your child’s education if you can vote to have the community pay for it?

Parents, grandparents’ aunts, and uncles as well as the local politician’s all vote to replace their local landfill especially when the additional revenue goes to pay for their child’s education. Remember at the same time by voting they increase the community’s revenues and well as enhance the quality of life to the community. We are simply removing the good old boys (Politicians) from delaying or standing in the way of speed to market.

All agreements made with TGD Environmental require the municipality to donate a percentage of revenues to the children’s education of the parents that have setup AN TGD Financials and rMost Valuable Insurance account to protect their children while also providing educational savings accounts with.

Once a second landfill project is established with letters of intent (LOI) and, a baseline is completed, it is at this point an additional $5 Million is to be placed into a second TGD Environmental Escrow Account. This funding would be earmarked to expand operations and development of the entire consortium alongside any additional landfill sites needing funding.

Carbon Credit Sales will provide us the funding needed to complete all the project(s) in development. It is expected we will never need to access the $5 Million remaining in the 2nd escrow account. The funding is simply needed for the stability of all entities within the rGreen Consortium. The $5 Million within the 2nd escrow account will be replaced with funds generated via operations of additional landfill projects.

Our Bioreactor is great for Brown Landfills (Closed/Capped Landfills) and ultimately based on the design we can also set them up to be Green Landfills “Sustainable Landfills".

Green Landfills “Sustainable Landfills" are simply an operational landfill that is yet to close being split into 4 sections and each section put into rotation over a period of 3-5 years and then each of the 4 portions as it is filled that portion is then harvested (Injected with air and water) and after 3-5 years the land that has utilized the TGD Environmental (ALBS) produces no more methane and the inert materials are dug up and then that portion can be filled as the next portion of the landfill, to produce carbon credits. no more landfill problem.

A very profitable solution used to support the community with a simple VOTE to Protect Mother Earth

We’re currently negotiating an agreement to consummate our first commercial-sized Aerobic Bioreactor as a startup. This particular project allows us the ability to Presale Carbon Credits before we even break ground. It should be known our group has done 17 smaller projects since the '90s.

We are fortunate that our 1st Commercial sized Aerobic Bioreactor is in an area where carbon credits, as of 2021 are $50 per ton.

The current Baseline measurement tells us our first project will put off about 1.2 Million Tons of Carbon Credits we will be eliminating. With Carbon Credits at $50 a ton, that is $60 Million Gross and after our cost of $10 Million to cover construction and the 3-5 years of operation - Leaving a Net of $50 million per our first Project.

How is it all done?

It’s all about the (CPa) Child Pro mobile app and the love of a child.

The most powerful thing in the world is a parents (families) love of their child.

It’s simple really. Parents Vote for Clean Air and Clean Water.

Why? There is nothing you can give a child more precious than your love the most powerful thing you can give a child is an education.

All parents (families) can finally create the funding needed with just a simple, confidential vote, that’s Why!

The kids are paid every time the truck is weighed going into the landfill!

All Politicians need to pay for their child’s education. All Politicians have to vote for clean and water to do this they have to vote to modernize/upgrade the local landfill to pay for their Childs education. All Municipalities landfill revenues increase by as much as 10 X revenue earnings. 10’s, 100’s of millions and billions of dollars going into their hands as well as directly into the children’s savings accounts.

Municipalities must agree that a percentage of the additional revenues earned by the Municipalities from the land fill go to the children’s educations within the community.

Although the parents Vote for Clean Air and Clean Water, they are really voting for the money earned by the municipality for the landfill services to pay for their child's education. Voting for Clean air and clean water means you as a parent will NOT have to pay for your child’s Higher education!

Travel Tourism Board Is rapidly already expanding into over 180+ countries now. This expansion is paving the way for the TGD Environmental by adding Ambassadors within those communities.

Politicians are put in a position to vote for clean air and clean water by each and every voting adult within the communities where the TGD Environmental exist.

Every adult, every local, regional, state / province politician that has a child(ren), grandchild(ren), nieces, or nephews are all incentivized to download our Child Pro (CP) Mobile App (We have a secret sauce not yet discussed that almost guarantees they will download the (CP) mobile App.) and they will use the app.
The Power of having the (CP) App at the center of the Consortium is that all the local politicians, parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, close friends, and the social world are all encouraged to vote for clean air and clean water.
We create evangelist with an appetite to have their child’s higher education paid for simply by voting for politicians who are also interested in having their children’s higher educations supported and paid for and doing the right things for the planet.
Obviously, as a citizen within the community, if you do NOT have to pay for your child's education and if it is NOT an expense to the community’s treasury, then all will vote for clean air and water to have their child's higher education paid for.
In return the TGD Environmental has a socio-political voice by which to make the world a better place!

Parents, grandparents’ aunts, and uncles as well as the local politician’s all vote to replace their local landfill.

They simply vote for clean air and clean water, especially when the additional revenue goes to pay for their child’s education.

Remember at the same time by voting they increase the community’s revenues and well as enhance the quality of life to the community. We are simply removing the good old boys (Politicians) from delaying or standing in the way of speed to market.

Communities for Education promotes TGD Environmental,CPa Mobile App.

rGreen Communities for Education is our Boots onThe Ground Warriors/Ambassadors which greatly speed up the expansion process of TGD Consortium.

rGreen Communities for Education utilizes “Peer to Peer Networking" and our “Secret Sauce" to get everyone within the community to download the CP Mobile App, in doing this the TGD Environmental is establishing VOTES to push for New Landfill Project switch in Communities worldwide.

Parents simply vote for Clean Air and Clean Water via our Child Pro App

The Child Pro App sits in the center of all the businesses within the TGD Consortium.

Communities For Education as an example works hand in hand with TGD Financial's providing among other things crowdfunding for education via the swipe of all Debit, Pre-Paid, and Credit Cards issued by Utilizing the (CPa) Child Pro app. All cards would have a selected/ your child’s picture across the entire card.

Swipes of all cards generate 1% - 15% of the sale going to your child(ren), grandchild(s),niece(s),nephew(s) loved one’s education with, the ability to round up the purchase price providing that little extra towards your child’s education.

Note: The CP Mobile App works with all the entities/businesses that are part of the rGreen Consortium

Additional funding comes from funding generated by TGD Environmental, rMost Valuable Insurance, rFramers and all businesses within the TGD Consortium.

Crowdfunding promoted by the Communities for Education Ambassadors becomes prevalent everywhere within the community and it serves to allow parents, grandparents aunts, and uncles, to NOT only call, vote or show up to city council meetings to speak with their local Politicians, but to also experience a better quality of life and fully funded higher educations for all their children via the crowdfunded economies/communities they live within.

The Child Pro App provides a loud voice for landfill change within the community.

TGD Environmental plans to meet with several leaders of the local Landfill Management Waste Municipalities and provide them a sample Letter of Intent of what an agreement might look like alongside a Landfill Checklist they would need to complete.

Proud member of TGD Consortium

If you run or are adding Garbage into a landfill now.
Closed a landfill within the last 10 years.
Have recently closed a landfill.
Plan to have a landfill filled full in the next few years.

Let us Catapult your Revenues and make you a SUPERHERO!

It cost you nothing to let us change your world!

The Sustainable Landfill Sequence

This will be in phase 2 regarding the consortium.

Thank you for taking the time out of your day to learn about us! It is our pleasure to have the opportunity to introduce TGD Environmental to you. We have a passion for making things better here on Earth. Our mission focuses heavily on turning normal daily activities into real opportunities to improve life for every family in every community. We are taking a two phased approach to achieve the components of our mission. In Phase 1,we will begin by targeting Landfills in Alberta, Canada to raise the startup capital needed for Phase 2, the creation of the TGD Consortium".

Below is additional white paper and supporting documentation that can be found throughout the web.

Appendix IV

The Kyoto Accord*

The Kyoto Accord is a formal international agreement between 158 nations wherein each country has negotiated and been assigned certain greenhouse gas emission targets that they must reach by specific dates. The agreement came into force in February 2005 and is administered by the United Nations. Countries that do not achieve their targets will pay a heavy price. In future compliance periods, they will bear a penalty of 30% more reductions. Canada is a signatory to the agreement but, as of this writing, has not set targets for reductions.

Under the agreement, the costs of compliance will be very high, particularly in developed nations that generate a majority of offending emissions. The agreement makes provision for a “trade and cap" system for the trading of emission credits. In order to minimize the total cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, countries and companies can purchase credits from sources that have excess credits. Projects that generate emission reduction sat the lowest cost will proceed and can sell their credits to countries and companies that cannot economically justify limiting their emissions because of the high cost of doing so.These credits, when sold, will provide the capital required to bring projects to market.The market for greenhouse gases (GHG) is flourishing in Europe. Initial trading volumes were small but have escalated to daily trading volumes of millions of credits and are expected to increase exponentially in the next several years.

Existing Conditions

When the United Nations examined the generation of GHG, there were several areas of activity that comprised a significant percentage of the emissions: fossil fuel electrical power generation, vehicles, chemical industry, oil & gas companies, metals & mining industries, and landfills. The United Nations concluded that about 15% of all emissions are generated by landfills, primarily in the form of methane and carbon dioxide. Methane is over 23 times more harmful to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. On average,worldwide, every person on the planet generates about one ton of waste annually and landfills generate about one ton of carbon equivalent for every ton of material in placement. By eliminating methane, large-scale reductions of GHG emissions can be achieved.

Existing and alternative emission reduction technologies are very expensive. Coal-fired electrical generation facilities will require expensive scrubbers and ultimately be replaced by “clean air" technologies such as natural gas burning facilities, wind power or nuclear reactors. Automobile emissions will be replaced by hydrogen fuel cells and electrical“hybrids". Metal and mining companies will have to employ scrubbers and high temperature gas incinerators. All of these technologies have a high cost of implementation and operation as well as significant technological risks. Hydrogen fuel cell development, for example, is expensive and requires the development of new fueling technologies to implement.

The conclusion of virtually every authority regarding gas emissions reduction has been that the easiest, most cost-effective process, is to mitigate GHG emissions from landfills.Landfills are universal and generate large volumes of GHG. The technology to cont roll and fill gases is mature and has the least risk.

United Nations Position on Aerobic Processes

Landfills are engineered to prevent moisture and oxygen from entering the waste mass and creating toxic “leachate" which will affect groundwater. Typically, landfills are“capped" with a thick layer of high-density clay to prevent incursions, thus allowing an aerobic bacteria to flourish. The anaerobic bacteria slowly decompose the organic elements and produce methane and carbon dioxide gases.

The United Nations, under the Kyoto Accord, has stated that aerobic processes are NATURAL processes. In the autumn, leaves fall onto the forest floor, are exposed to moisture through rain and snow and are “composted" naturally in about 3 years. Aerobic bacteria flourish and combine the carbon elements of the organic material (leaves) with the oxygen from the air producing carbon dioxide. There is no methane production and there is very little odor, if any.

The UN has further stated that since the aerobic process is natural, any carbon dioxide generated will not be netted against methane elimination. This means that any aerobic process that eliminates methane will enjoy the full effects of that methane reduction without any net reduction in credits for carbon dioxide production.

Various Kyoto Protocol GHG Commodities

Assigned Amount (AAU) is the total amount of greenhouse gas that each ratifying country is allowed to emit during the first commitment period (2008 – 2012) of the Kyoto Protocol. AAUs are issued by governments that have emission reduction commitments.They can be traded between countries pursuant to international emissions trading,provided that these countries are fully compliant with eligibility requirements.

Certified Emission Reductions (CER) are units of greenhouse gas reductions generated from CDM projects (in countries that do not have emission reduction commitments under the Kyoto Protocol), verified by external, UN-accredited third-party verifiers, and issued by the regulatory body of CDM, the CDM Executive Board. CER’s can be used for compliance with Kyoto Protocol obligations or to meet emissions caps under the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. CER’s are often traded in forward contracts.

Emission Reduction Units (ERU) are units of greenhouse gas reductions generated from Joint Implementation projects (in countries, i.e., typically, economies in transition, that have emission reduction commitments under the Kyoto Protocol), verified by external

UN accredited third party verifiers (under what is known as track 2, JI), and issued by the host country. ERU’s are also often traded in forward contracts.Kyoto commodities are measured in tons of CO2 equivalent. All Kyoto commodities have a compliance value until 2012.

* Additional information on the Kyoto Accord and Climate Change:

United Nations:http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php

Simplified Answers on Kyoto and GHGs:http://www.answers.com/topic/kyoto-protocol

Climate Change Central – informative Canadian

site:http://www.climatechangecentral.com/default.asp?V_DOC_ID=835

Appendix V

Projected Ontario Waste Aerobic Emission Reductions Table Projected Aerobic Emission Reductions For Ontario Waste (1996 to 2006) *

Aerobic

Waste Emissions

Population Disposal Reduction

Year of Ontario (Tons) (Tonnes-CO2)

1996 10,753,573 8,913,786 8,227,405

1997 10,740,868 6,659,338 7,924,612

1998 10,908,163 6,988,157 8,315,907

1999 11,075,458 6,778,180 8,066,035

2000 11,242,753 7,615,923 9,062,948

2001 11,410,045 7,416,529 8,825,670

2002 11,913,397 7,743,708 9,215,013

2003 11,963,749 7,776,437 9,253,960

2004 12,416,749 8,070,887 9,604,355

2005 12,558,669 8,163,135 9,714,130

2006 12,686,952 8,246,519 9,813,357

Total Emission Reductions: 98,023,392

* Based on US EPA Standard "Landgem" Gas Prediction Model calculations

Appendix VI

Statistics Canada Population and Waste Tables

1. Population of Ontario - 1851 to 2001

2. Population of Canada and Provinces by Age Group – 2006

3. Waste Disposal by Source, By Province – 2000 and 2002

Appendix VII

City of Detroit Incineration

1. Incinerators cost Detroit Money & Clean Air

2. Detroit Waste Incinerator: Billion Dollar Boondoggle

3. For A Clean and Safe Detroit: Close the Country’s Largest Incinerator

Incinerators cost Detroit Money & Clean Air

ROB CEDAR / The Detroit News – August 28, 2002

We are hooked on incineration and it's a dirty, expensive habit.Not only does Wayne County have two municipal waste incinerators, one of which is the largest in the country, but we also have the state's only medical waste incinerator and an old sewersludge incinerator. Moreover, the state Department of Environmental Quality recently approved a second sewer sludge incinerator that will be the largest of its kind.

One issue is that pollution permits issued for incinerators are based on something called achievable technology. That means they must use the best methods available to minimize release of toxins -- though none of the methods eliminates harmful emissions. Instead, they only achieve60 to 90 percent reduction.

As a result, thousands of tons -- yes, tons -- of toxic substances are legally released each year nationwide. And that's if everything is working within the permit limits.Additionally, toxins that do not go up the stack become concentrated in the ash and filter dust.These end products are classified as hazardous or special waste that must be disposed of in special, costly landfills.A list of the toxic chemicals released along with the potential health dangers, would take more space than is available here. But to illustrate the point, let's look at the permitted mercurye missions for the Detroit Municipal Incinerator near the intersection of I-75 and I-94.

This single facility releases enough mercury each year to contaminate all of Lake St Clair. This becomes believable when we consider that Lake St. Clair and every other inland lake in Michigan has fish advisory warnings for mercury. Incinerators also are the biggest source of dioxins, a known carcinogen often called the most toxic substance known.

Inflated costs

Incinerators are expensive to operate, with much of the cost going toward futile efforts to make them safe.

After the Detroit incinerator failed emission tests, for instance, the city was ordered to install more than $200 million in equipment upgrades. And the Central Wayne Incinerator in Dearborn Heights paid more than $100 million to expand ash handling capacity and upgrade the incinerator. After the Medical Waste Incinerator in Hamtramck failed to meet its mercury emissions limit, the owners spent more than $2 million to upgrade the pollution reduction equipment, but still failed the mercury tests.

To pay for the high startup cost and expensive upgrades, communities sending their waste to these incinerators are forced into long-term contracts and financing schemes locking them into paying higher costs than competitive landfill rates.

For example, Wayne, West land, Garden City, Ink ster and Dearborn are all locked into long-term contracts to feed the Central Wayne Incinerator.

These contracts are not without local criticism. West land voters this month rejected for the second time a tax renewal to pay for the incinerator. In response, Mayor Sandra Cicirellithreatened cuts in services. "The (40-year) contract is binding and the money is going to have to come from somewhere."

The city may put the incinerator tax question back on the ballot for a third time this November.

Councilwoman Cheryl Graunstadt doesn't feel West land taxpayers should be asked to pay "a debt that never seems to end," as she put it. She added that she "could not support additional public funds for the incinerator without a comprehensive plan to phase out incineration."

Also suffering from bloated incineration costs are Detroit and the communities sending waste to the Detroit incinerator. Some are forced to pay upwards of $130 per ton, while Toronto trucks its trash to Wayne County landfills for as little as $11 a ton.

The same is true with sewer sludge. As plans move forward to build another sewer sludge processing incinerator in the already polluted southwest Detroit Delray neighborhood, Canadians ludge is being trucked to special Michigan landfills. Did you know that most of the recent water rate increases were to upgrade the sludge incinerator.

Fairness issue

Another concern is that incinerators often are in poor or minority neighborhoods. These older industrialized neighborhoods are already overwhelmed with air pollution from a number of sources and their residents suffer from elevated levels of respiratory problems, including asthma and lung diseases. Higher rates of birth defects, low birth weights and increased cancer risk also are seen.The movement to erase such inequities is called environmental justice and is an issue of human and civil rights.

Everybody has the right to breathe clean, healthy air and cities should not be tied to long-term,bloated contracts that take valuable resources from our limited city budgets while poisoning our communities. Families should not have to trade good health for affordable housing.

If we are serious about the revitalization of our urban neighborhoods, we have to address the issues of air pollution and environmental justice. We need to understand that our reliance on incineration is bad for our health, bad for our budgets and bad for our neighborhoods.Communities need to take a stand against incineration by finding ways to break the habit.

Rob Cedar is a first-term member of the Hamtramck City Council and Director of HEAT, the Hamtramck Environmental Action Team. He can be reached at (313) 365-4722 [email protected].

Detroit Waste Incinerator: Billion-Dollar Boondoggle

The City of Detroit could have saved over $55 million in just one year if it had never built the incinerator.

(October 2005)

What could the City of Detroit do with a billion dollars? Wasteful and impractical only begin to describe how the City of Detroit, faced with a $300 million deficit for the current fiscal year, will have misspent about one billion dollars over the course of 20 years on a single project – the Detroit Incinerator.

It’s worth it to imagine a "What if?" scenario to illustrate the incredible folly that has come to plague a city in perpetual financial trouble -- currently facing hundreds of layoffs and a continuing population decline -- because it illustrates the dire need for an alternative. What if Detroit never built the incinerator and simply land filled all of its trash instead?

In 2003, Detroit generated 575,896 tons of trash. Operation of the Detroit Incinerator is over seen by the Greater Detroit Resource Recovery Authority (GDRRA), which has a contract with City Management (a subsidiary of Waste Management) for disposal of trash at a landfill for$33.25/ton. Had Detroit land filled its trash in 2003, the total bill would have come to a little over$19 million. The amount GDDRA charged Detroit to burn the trash? An unbelievable $75million, or over $130/ ton! The City of Detroit could have saved over $55 million in just one year if it had never built the incinerator.

The total cost (tipping fee) for Detroit to “dispose" of less than 600,000 tons of trash in Fiscal Year 2005-06 (FY0506) is budgeted at $81,129,823, which is over $135/ton to burn or bury trash.

This does not include the cost of trash collection, which is an additional $11,445,983. Compare this to the nearby communities of the Southeastern Oakland County Resource Recovery Authority(SOCRRA) whose members paid an average of less than $29/ton for a combination of disposal and recycling services during FY0405.

The single largest debt of the City of Detroit is its bill for the construction and additional pollution controls for Detroit’s trash incinerator. The debt payment owed to Comerica Bank and the Bank of New York for Fiscal Year 2005-06 (FY0506) is estimated at $67.4 million. Detroit’s contract with GDRRA and debt on the incinerator is for 20 years (1989-2009) so the city will have wasted more than one billion dollars for building and operating the incinerator. All of the current contracts for operation and debt of the incinerator end in 2009.

To further complicate things, in 1991 the City of Detroit was also facing a deficit. GDRRA sold the Detroit Incinerator for $634.9 million to Philip Morris Capital Corp. (tobacco) and Aircraft Services Corp. (a subsidiary of General Electric). Detroit received $54 million from the sale but is now beholden to these private interests in a sale-leaseback agreement. If Detroit wanted to end the use of the incinerator for trash "disposal" before 2009, the city would have to pay these private interests an early closure penalty. If it were not for this penalty the city could close the incinerator, finish paying off the construction debt and still possibly save some money by land filling the trash instead, or better yet implementing comprehensive recycling.

The Detroit Incinerator has also been an environmental disaster. It is a major source of air pollution for the region. The latest readily available data (1999) from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ranks the incinerator #6 of 124 major sources in Wayne County for nitrogenox ides (1,444 tons). Nitrogen oxides create ground-level ozone (smog) and contribute to global warming. The incinerator is also ranked #8 of 106 major sources in Wayne County for sulfur dioxide (170 tons). Both nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide aggravate respiratory illnesses (such as asthma) and contribute to acid rain.

How does SOCRRA keep its costs so low? Under the City Management contract with GDRRA,Waste Management delivers SOCRRA’s non-recyclable trash to the Detroit Incinerator at a costof only $10.45/ton! The residents of Detroit not only have to breathe the pollution from the incinerator, but they subsidize the cost of burning Oakland County’s trash as well.

There will be an opportunity for a better alternative when all of the contracts and debt end in2009. Whoever is elected the next mayor of Detroit will decide whether the city will continue the dirty and expensive practice of running an incinerator or turning to the cleaner and cheaper practice of comprehensive recycling.

For more information:

Brad van Guilder, Ecology Center,

(734) 663-2400 ext. 114

[email protected]

For A Clean and Safe Detroit: Close the Country’s Largest Incinerator By Mary Beth Doyle and Brad van Guilder

(The Ecology Center publication From the Ground Up, March 2002)When Kwame Kilpatrick was campaigning in last fall’s mayoral race, he called for new ideas to improve Detroit’s public services and address severe financial problems. A coalition of neighborhood and environmental organizations are offering the new Mayor a plan to do both,and to clean the City’s air at the same time. The Ecology Center, Detroiters Working for Environmental Justice, and 10 other groups are calling for the City to close its trash in cine rat or and start a comprehensive recycling program. This plan would make better use of resources,reduce air pollution, and save the city money.

Detroit began building its incinerator in 1986, despite protests from environmental justice and public health activists, who were dismayed to see the city invest so heavily in a polluting technology. “We knew then that this was a bad idea for the environment, and we’ve since learned that it’s a bad idea financially as well," said Ed McArdle, Detroit-area resident, Ecology Center Vice-President, and Sierra Club activist.

At the time, proponents considered incineration to be a clean and affordable alternative to landfills, but the project quickly turned into another expensive embarrassment for Detroit. Today,the Detroit incinerator is the largest of any municipality in the U.S. It burns more than 700,000tons of waste per year — about 3,000 tons per day — of which 60% comes from Detroit. The City will spend about $77 million this year to burn and landfill its trash, nearly ten times the amount paid per ton by its suburban neighbors.

A Question of Health and Justice

The incinerator sits in the heart of the city where I-75 and I-94 intersect, in a low-income,predominantly African American neighborhood. The surrounding community is already exposed

to pollutants from numerous sources in the area, including Michigan’s only commercial medical waste incinerator, the GM Pole town plant, and two major highways.It is in this overburdened community that Detroit decided to build the incinerator, which is legally allowed to release more than 25 tons of hazardous air pollutants and more than 1,800tons of other pollutants, including sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxide, particulate matter, mercury, and lead, every year.

A recent Michigan Senate report cited municipal waste incinerators as the second largest source of mercury contamination in Michigan and a threat to the Great Lakes. Municipal waste incinerators are also a major source of dioxin, a persistent chemical that is toxic even in very small amounts. Dioxin is a hormone disrupter that can cause cancer as well as reproductive and developmental effects.

The community already has its share of health concerns. The neighborhoods surrounding the facility have one of the highest rates of elevated blood lead levels in the city. Almost 40% of Detroit children with elevated blood lead levels live within 10 zip code areas in the center of the city, including the area containing the incinerator. Many pollutants from incinerators can affect

lung function and trigger asthma attacks. Detroit has one of the highest asthma rates in the country — three times the national average — and ranks third in asthma-related deaths. It leads the nation for asthma death rate among African Americans.

Regardless of whether these health problems are caused by emissions from facilities like the Detroit incinerator, the prevalence of these illnesses within the community makes this population more susceptible to harm from the pollutants emitted by the incinerator.

Who Profits?

The Greater Detroit Resource Recovery Authority (GDRRA) is the public body responsible for the bond repayment and operation of the facility, and Covanta Energy Corporation (formerlyOgden) oversees day-to-day operations. However, the incinerator is owned by Philip Morris Capital Corporation, a subsidiary of the tobacco conglomerate. Philip Morris bought the facility in 1991 and leases it back to the city.

“It’s been well-documented that cigarette companies target minority communities like Detroit with their billboards," said Donele Wilkins, Executive Director of Detroiters Working for Environmental Justice. “It’s ironic Philip Morris is targeting our community with the country’s largest municipal waste incinerator as well."

Continued operation of the incinerator is also an economic disaster for the citizens of Detroit. In the current fiscal year, Detroit will spend $77 million to burn and landfill approximately 600,000tons of trash.This $130-per-ton cost is an Enron-sized scandal, given the City’s fiscal problems and the disposal costs paid by its suburban neighbors. The Southern Oakland County Resource Recovery Authority (SOCCRA) recently received a bid of less than $14 per ton to dispose of its trash at Republic Industries’ Carleton Farms Landfill in Sumpter Township. The City of Ann Arbor pays even less for its combination of landfill disposal, recycling, and composting.

Were Detroit to shut down its incinerator in favor of landfill disposal, the City would probably receive bids even lower than SOCCRA’s because of its large volume of trash. Even if Detroit couldn’t beat SOCCRA’s price, and even if it was forced to pay off the remaining $400 million on the incinerator bonds, the City could possibly save $20 million per year. If the City added a comprehensive recycling program to the effort, the savings could reach as high as $25 million per year.

Cut Your Losses, Mr. Mayor In January, community leaders and environmentalists from around the state spoke out against thefacility at a Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) public hearing about the facility’s Renewable Operating Permit. Citing incomplete €les, inadequate public notice, and environmental justice concerns, person after person spoke up to demand that the Department deny the permit.

But even if MDEQ does grant the permit (there is no case where a Renewable Operating Permit has been denied), environmentalists and Detroit community leaders plan to continue their efforts to shut down the incinerator. “Incineration is not good for public health, and it is not good for the city’s bottom line," said Ed McArdle. “It is time to make Detroit an incinerator-free zone."

The incinerator continues to pollute low-income neighborhoods and drain money out of city coffers. Now it’s time for Mayor Kilpatrick to cut the City’s losses on the plant –right here, right now.

Appendix VIII

Additional Information Accessible on the Internet

Waste Management and the Environment III (Witpress.com)
Comparison of Leachate Quality from Aerobic and Anaerobic municipal Solid Waste Bioreactors
Quality and Quantity of Leachate in Aerobic Pilot Scale Landfills
Bioreactor Landfills, An Overview Perspective by John Pacey (Emcon Engineering) [MSW Management Magazine]
Solid Waste Management and Global Warming (SPREP)
Aerobic landfill bioreactor United States Patent 6364572
Degradation of Municipal Solid Waste in Simulated Aerobic and Anaerobic Bioreactor Landfills
Operational Characteristics of Two Aerobic Landfill Systems
Comparison of Aerobic and Anaerobic Bio treatment of Municipal Solid Waste, Peter Zawislanski
The Bioreactor Landfill, Waste Management Bioreactor Program
Effect of Aeration on Fresh and aged Municipal Solid Waste in a Simulated Landfill Bioreactor- Ryerson University
Leachate Recirculation or Clean Water Addition: A Comparative Study
The Status of Aerobic Bioreactor Landfills in the US, NCWANA Debra Rein hart, Nicole Berge, Mark Hudgins
Effect of Combined Air Injection and Leachate Recirculation on Biodegradation of MSW
Interim Guidelines for the Production and Use of Compost in Ontario 1749e.pdf
‘Draft’ Guidelines for Aerobic Composting Facilities and Compost Use (Ontario)
Operating Landfills as Bioreactors to Decompose and Stabilize Solid Waste, Timothy Townsend
U.S. EPA Project XL: Yolo County’s Accelerated Anaerobic and Aerobic Composting (Full Scale Controlled Landfill Bioreactor) Project
Reducing Potential for Climate Effects of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases
Aerobic bio reduction of municipal solid waste landfill mass. U.S. Patent 6481929
Updated Research Report on Bioreactor Landfills, Landfill Leachate Recirculation and Landfills with Methane Recovery
Characterization of Land filled Municipal Solid Waste Following IN SITU Aerobic Bio reduction
Municipal Partnership in the Ottawa Valley Chooses to Walk Lightly on the Environment
Using Municipal Solid Waste Compost
Innovative Uses of Compost, Erosion Control, Turf Remediation, and Landscaping
In Situ Municipal Solid Waste Composting Using an Aerobic Landfill System
The Aerobic Landfill System
Biodegradation Won’t Solve the Landfill Crunch
How to Sustain your Landfill
Composting Council of Canada, 25 Questions and Answers about Composting
Composting Regulations and Guidelines Across Canada
A Methodology to Estimate the Carbon Off Set Potential of Composting Bio-Degradable
Municipal Solid Waste
The next sustainable revolution in solid waste management: bioreactor landfills (American Public Works Association)
Optimization of Landfill Mining, R.J. Murphy
Aerobic landfill process spreads in the Southeast with a new site in TN
Preserving Resources through Integrated Sustainable Management of Waste (Landfill Mining)
Landfill Reclamation EPA 530-F-97-001 July 1997
Recycling the landfill: the mining of disposal sites, Tom Watson
Discussion Document and Draft Regulations: Landfill Mining/Reclamation Regulations (Massachusetts)
Assessing the Opportunities of Landfill Mining
Evaluation of the Collier County Florida Landfill Mining Demonstration
Methods of improved landfill mining ISSN 0734-9750
Exploring the Economics pf Mining Landfills (Waste Age)
Analysis of Municipal Waste Sites and Landfills in the United States
Guidance Note on Recuperation of Landfill Gas from Municipal Solid Waste (World Bank working paper)
Landfill Space Reuse Robert Spencer
ACUA Wins International Award for Landfill Management
Bioreactor Landfills: An Idea whose Time has Come. MSW Management (Christopher Camp man, Alfred Yates)

Team:

R.J. Randall – Co Founder

Bernard Kiesel – Co Founder

BACKGROUND:

A. The Landfill Owner is operating a landfill located at _________________________________ (“Landfill") which appears suitable for the application of the Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Technology.

TGD Environmental is interested in implementing the Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Technology at the Landfill.

The Landfill Owner and TGD Environmental (“the Parties") which to share the value that comes from the implementation of the Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Technology.

This Letter will establish the basic terms to be used in a future agreement between the Parties. The terms contained in this Letter are not comprehensive and it is expected that additional terms may be added, and existing terms may be changed and deleted. The basic terms are as follows:

KEY TERMS:

Non-Binding

1. This Letter does not create a binding agreement between the Parties and will not be enforceable. Only the future agreement, duly executed by the Parties, will be enforceable. The terms and conditions of any future agreement will supersede any terms and conditions contained in this Letter. The Parties are not prevented from entering into negotiations with other third parties with regard to the subject matter of this Letter.

Transaction Description

2. The transaction is broadly described as follows:

Within 30 days from the signing of this Letter, the Landfill Owner will provide access to all relevant and reasonably available data on the Landfill, subject to the signing of any required and separate Non-Disclosure Agreements.
Over the period of 90 days from the provision of the required data, TGD Environmental will undertake a comprehensive assessment of the potential for the development of the Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Technology at the Landfill at its sole expense.
At the conclusion of that period, TGD Environmental will prepare a detailed proposal to the Landfill Owner as to the development of the Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Technology at the Landfill, which may include the following:

Sharing of the capital and operating costs for the implementation of the Aerobic Landfill Bioreactor Technology, such that TGD Environmental may contribute all or substantially all of these costs.

Subject to the results of the assessment, the Parties will finalize the commercial terms of the transaction, such that both parties will achieve economic and environmental benefits relative to their respective contributions to the capital and operating costs for the project, which will include any of the following:

Sharing of the income from the sale of any carbon offset credits from the reduction in methane emissions at the Landfill.
Sharing of the value of the recovered landfill capacity at the Landfill.
Sharing of the value of the reduced forecast monitoring and closing costs for the Landfill.
Sharing of the incremental land value achieved from the redevelopment of the recovered landfill area.

Representations

3. The Parties represent and warrant that they are duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the applicable jurisdiction. It has all requisite power and authority to carry on its business and to participate in the contemplated transaction.

The Letter accurately reflects the understanding between the Parties, signed on this ______________ day of __________, _______.

For Landfill Owner:

Signature: ________________________

Name/Title: ________________________

For TGD Environmental:

Signature: ________________________

Name/Title: ________________________

Upcoming Next

At the heart of the "Pay Me Revolution" TGD Financials is the harpoon to products and services; collecting, paying, crowd sourcing, crowd funding multi-faceted bank cards, purses, and a wallet.All these are access points to incentivization,and a rewards platforms provided by the TGD Consortium.

A captive insurance product, called rMost Valuable Insurance, cannot be found with any other insurer! This is a macro priced insurance coverage for children and their families.

The TGD Labs division is uniquely structured to provide technology and business solutions within the TGD Consortium that includes licensing, mobile support, and creative marketing services to the Consortium partners. We call it The People's Web.

Upcoming Next

TGD Communities for Education greatly speeds up the expansion process of the TGD Consortium by employing a Boots on The Ground grass roots approach where in community Warriors/Ambassadors share our products and services in their local regions.

NCOG, Ltd. is the first member company to be launched under the TGD Consortium. NCOG is a tokenized decentralized and distributed private search engine and transaction center with a social ecosystem that has an incentivization and rewards model built into its platform. NCOG is a community powered search engine that provides great results while protecting user privacy and reward is users for every action taken related to the NCOG platform. NCOG provides millions of products and services and an exchange center to spend what members earn.

Why did we create NCOG?

There is Fortunes in Data. We believe data should be treated as BIG Business treats data, a commodity in the connected world. Big Business gets paid from everything we do online and most of what we do offline. Big Business is and has been making a fortune on daily activities. One of the ways they do this is by collecting your data/information and selling it! Big Business now has more money than even the largest countries on the planet. We believe that personal data should not be free anymore! That's why we are introducing The Pay Me Revolution!

It doesn't stop there!

Upcoming Next

TGD Communities for Education greatly speeds up the expansion process of the TGD Consortium by employing a Boots on The Ground grass roots approach where in community Warriors/Ambassadors share our products and services in their local regions.

(TTB) Travel Tourism Board is currently already rapidly expanding into over 180+ countries today. This expansion is paving the way for the TGD Consortium by getting a head start on creating ambassadors of the Pay Me Revolution within those communities.

Nothing is more important than your

CHILD

Why us ?

Since we already described the core of our business, we now introduce the…

The Definition of a Captive Insurance Company:

Benefits from the captive insurance structure would be massively significant

Here's why:

Captive insurance companies continue to experience growth. One of the key reasons is that captives provide organizations with greater control over their risks in the following ways:

For more information, please contact:

Account Features

Parental Controls in the palm of your hand. Sit back and watch your student learn about money through completing tasks, spending responsibly, and working towards savings goals.

Financials Rebooted for Worldly Good!!!

Menu Includes:

TGD Financials works:

Sign up is easy as 1-2-3-4-5-6-7